Commissioner avmd adams, dooley, commissioner dwight, reilly, commissioner sarkissian, commissioner white. Aye. And that passes unanimously with 60. Great. Thank you very much. We appreciate it very much. Next item, please. Item no. 6. A pregnancy and discussion on research regarding Disability Access and readily achievable. Commissioners, i want to introduce to you Ronald Rodriguez who is a usf law student who approached us to do volunteer work this summer. We took him up on the opportunity and to build on the work that cushion was do ing around Disability Access and what is readily achievable. Hes here to discuss the work hes done. You are live on sf governor tv. Im ron rodriguez, a Research Analyst for small division. Today im discussing Disability Access and the in nature of readily achievable and how its defined. I was tasked with im sorry. They put it up on the slide. I was tasked to inquire about what the nature of readily achievable is and the intent was. Weve kind of and more
Opportunity and to build on the work that cushion was do ing around Disability Access and what is readily achievable. Hes here to discuss the work hes done. You are live on sf governor tv. Im ron rodriguez, a Research Analyst for small division. Today im discussing Disability Access and the in nature of readily achievable and how its defined. I was tasked with im sorry. They put it up on the slide. I was tasked to inquire about what the nature of readily achievable is and the intent was. Weve kind of and more specifically i was trying to determine whether permit fees and other externalities can be entered into this. The question is answered in the affirmative and these types of cost can be considered when making that determination. The discussion today is going to be revolved around my findings and the Current Situation more specifically the Current Situation in San Francisco and california in general and what that standard is and then i will give our recommendations as far as where we
Can be entered into this. The question is answered in the affirmative and these types of cost can be considered when making that determination. The discussion today is going to be revolved around my findings and the Current Situation more specifically the Current Situation in San Francisco and california in general and what that standard is and then i will give our recommendations as far as where we want to go with our next step. So the current environment in San Francisco. There are hundreds of lawsuits being filed annually just in the North District alone there were between 250300 lawsuits filed last year. These lawsuits mostly target Small Businesses. As i had this discussion earlier a lot of them are around polk street, a lot of these are very targeted. A lot of these plaintiffs and plaintiffs attorneys they have come, its been done a number of times. Its assumed that this is almost a Business Model of some sort and very costly for businesses to be in compliance. And what makes it
We have and that our business even though we offer, the Health Insurance benefits and so i think that there is some real upside to this and i would like to explore it more and in lieu of making any Firm Commitment here and at least know that you have our interest, and support in learning more about how we can support you. One of the things that i should tell you is the quality of care that the patients get is primarily on priet mare level. But, it is really phenomenal. And i invite all of you to come out and see the clinic, and just the feel of the clinic and a lot of the people have the mental image of some because we dont take any insurance there is no forms but they can do the medicine, and they can practice the medicine in the way that they wanted to practice it, about the importance of filling out the bureaucratic forms. And the doctor visits are more, i would contend longer than any or most of which you would get, and the visits that they meet for a half hour and i think that if
Aye. Weiner. Aye. Commissioner yee. Aye. The item passes. Okay, lets go on to the plans and programs item. Item 6. Allocate 6,795,385 in prop k funds, with conditions, for eleven requests, subject to the attached fiscal year cash flow distribution schedules and amend the relevant 5year prioritization programs. This is an action item. Okay. Colleagues, comments or questions . No, we will go on to Public Comment, any member of the public that would like to comment . And seeing none, come forward we will close Public Comment and have another roll call vote. 6, avalos. Aye. Breed. Aye. Campos. Aye. Chiu. Aye. Cohen . Absent. Farrell. Absent. Kim. Aye. Mar. Aye. Tang. Aye. Weiner. Aye. Yee. Aye. Aye. The item passes. Item 7, introduction of new items this is an information item. Colleagues, any new item issues to come before the Transportation Authority . Seeing none, we will go on to Public Comment on this item. And seeing no member of the public come forward we will close Public Comment a