Latest Breaking News On - Is on trial - Page 1 : vimarsana.com

telling jack smith quite a lot about what donald trump was not doing or saying during those hours on january 6th. what else does jack smith, what more does jack smith need to learn about that day? >> i would say based on the reporting, nothing. what he needs is a trial date that sticks. this is a very strong case. having said that, obviously you have to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt unanimous ri, in order to have a conviction. so i don't want to say this is what's going to happen, but in terms of the strength of the case, that's when i can bring any experience, this is a strong case, seeing the dan scavino reporting, assuming that's accurate, that's another nail, but there are many many nails that he has. >> getting a trial is now the hurdle. the supreme court says it's going to hear the case about presidential immunity, right, is that the one? >> they have the disqualification one. the one thing we know for sure. >> the supreme court is hearing

i believe him more. they really don't want him to come in. >> reporter: you're speaking to voters at a trump rally, they're obviously very bought in to donald trump, what are you hearing outside the rallies from voters who aren't showing up and wearing all the gear? >> reporter: i think the hard part here, katy is the fact that the number of folks showing up at the rallies are by and large the folks that are going to undoubtedly caucus. you go to a nikki haley event or ron desantis event, there's not a ground swell of support like we saw in past years for a rick san torum or ted cruz or bernie sanders or pete buttigieg but when we're talking about the trial, i talked to voters who tell me they wish that liz cheney was running here because it's very much so as ali vitali was saying earlier today about the voters she talks to at nikki haley events, come the general election, they may want nikki haley now but would vote for trump in the general election. there's a disconnect between

trying to overturn the institution. somebody who's being put on trial for taking classified documents and hoarding them, and putting them in the bathroom, putting them on a stage in a ballroom, why does that sound like the person that you would want to put back in the white house in 2024 if you're a republican voter? >> i think for a lot of republican voters, what you just said they would say donald trump was doing the right thing, that he was, you know, fighting against and then fill in the adjectives of how they would describe biden, the swamp, all of the things that donald trump says he's going to fight against. the donald trump candidacy isn't a series of policy positions, it's an attitude. you talked about the voters vaughn talked to earlier. they are all bought in. you're not shaking them. if you look at voters who have chosen donald trump to be their pick, whether it's the iowa caucus or new hampshire primary, they don't have a second choice. it's donald trump or bust. that one voter said i'll write donald trump in again. comparing them to bozo the

let's put aside for the moment whether you can legally vote for him or not. why would you want to factually, there's no question that he engaged in insurrection, what are we saying about a country where a leading candidate engaged in insurrection, and you're thinking, that's no big deal. i think they should still be president. >> that's a really good segue to my next guest. i wish i could have an hour talking about the maine/colorado decision. it's very complicated. anybody who say it's simple is dill luting themselves, and the supreme court is in a super tough position. a double edged sword in many ways. andrew weissmann, to be continued. thank you for joining us. let's go to former communications director for the republican national committee, doug hyde, why would you want to vote for somebody who may have participated in an insurrection, being investigated and going on trial for election interference,

it is conceivable. it really is possible that they say, you know what, how many times do we want to be sort of the decider here and to take another trump case. as we just talked about, they're going to take one. i still think they will likely take it, just because it is important for the country to have the supreme court rule. >> do you think that they are likely to rule that he does enjoy immunity as president or that he does not? >> does not. so the argument tomorrow in d.c., i am not really looking for, oh, how receptive they are to donald trump's argument that he is immune from criminal prosecution. i am looking at the issue of how fast they will decide and how soon they will give judge chutkan a green light. >> do you think this trial is still going to happen in march? >> i think that's going to be hard for it to go in march, and then we're going to be dealing with the alvin brag case, which is at least currently scheduled for the end of march, and that

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - FOXNEWS - 20180812:21:54:00

incredible work to help.i think that is the bottom line. jon: spoken from experience. former police commissioner for the city of boston, serving at the time of the boston marathon bombing. we appreciate your insight. thank you very much for sharing with us. we are continuing to keep an eye on the protests in dc. we want to get to some of the other news of the day now. trial the president's former campaign chair, paul manafort reconvenes tomorrow afternoon after a bit of a cliffhanger on friday. the judge taking a five hour recess without explaining why. the trial is the first courtroom test of special counsel robert mueller 's russia probe. wherever he goes the white house is standing firm on his position. he is counsel to the president, kellyanne conway earlier today. >> there is no collision, paul manafort is on trial. it has nothing to do with the

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20180803:06:08:00

don't. whatever. what does it tell you when the president of the united states sends out members of his own administration to make the case he should be making himself. that russia attacked our democracy. russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election. russia is constantly working to divide america. the facts are there. the intelligence agencies are saying it. they all are saying it. and they're doing a pretty good job of it, russia is. so why doesn't this president, why won't this president in the words of his own fbi director take the threat seriously? it's no coincidence that all of this is happening as the mueller investigation is moving into the oval office, as mueller is pressing for a sit-down interview with the president himself. as former trump campaign manager paul manafort is on trial. the first trial to come out of the mueller investigation. and as the president brands the whole thing a witch hunt. the fact is this is no witch hunt. robert mueller is doing what the president should be doing. he's working to get the facts. the truth about what russia did in 2016.

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20180803:02:09:00

paul manafort is on trial. the first trial to come out of the mueller investigation. and as the president brands the whole thing a witch hunt. the fact is this is no witch hunt. robert mueller is doing what the president should be doing. he's working to get the facts. the truth about what russia did in 2016. and about what russia is still doing right now. that's the only way, the only way we can defend our democracy. i'm going to bring in chris soliza and josh campbell. gentlemen, good evening. thank you for joining us on this lovely evening. chris, why isn't the president as forceful or direct as his intelligence team? >> he doesn't believe it? despite all evidence to the contrary. look, i think at this point when donald trump says it, let's take him at his word. over and over and over again he

three then were found in their apartment with their necks slit. one was a boxer. a man told investigators that the older tsarnaev brother was involved in those murders. tsarnaev's younger brother dzhokhar tsarnaev has been charged in the bombing and pleaded not guilty. >> the wife of martin macneill is on trial. it's about to rachet it up with the children about to testify for the prosecution. >> reporter: today, the children of dr. martin macneill, a instead of closer to testifying, against their own father. prosecutors say the first up as soon as 30 expected to be 12-year-old aida mac neil, only