and babies getting attention from politicians. keir starmer is quite the fan of visiting lower league football grounds in places he hopes labour can win. he was in gillingham, in kent this morning his deputy with him, too. thank you. whatever service people try and access these days, they find it s like wading through treacle. red cards aren t usually welcome for folk on a football pitch, but expect to see plenty of these in the next month or so, spelling out labour s core message. we ve had 1a years of going round and round in circles, getting absolutely nowhere. chaos and division feeding chaos and division. if you want change, you have to vote for it. and if you vote labour, it s a vote to stop the chaos. it s a vote to turn the page, and it s a vote to rebuild our country together. thank you very much, thank you! a general election is about winning seats and staying in them. rishi sunakjust about managed that in ilkeston, in derbyshire, as he made the case the economy i
to below the 1.5 degrees celsius? when we produced our landmark report five years ago, we said it was possible within the laws of physics and chemistry, and the biggest obstacle to keeping within the limit was actually on the social and institutional side. we, i think, now need to move to the position, we have to look very hard at whether we will be pushing against technical and economic barriers in terms of limiting warming to1.5. it is not absolutely impossible, but the chances are diminishing. and, really, it s hanging on a thread at the moment. right. isn t that a tactful way of saying, i m not in a position to be conclusive about this, but as far as i m concerned, as an experienced scientist, it is simply not going to happen ? the average temperature rise is going to go appreciably beyond 1.5. yeah, ipcc s job is to assess the literature that we have out there already, and we haven t got quite the literature yet to absolutely write off the 1.5 limit. and we need to be
we will continue to forge ahead to do that, but that decision, as you ve said, on so many levels, is totally wrong headed, and we ll be happy to work with congress, with this committee, on an appropriate response. those comments from the us secretary of state came as he faced criticism from democrats and republicans over the administration s israel policy. as he began his testimony, mr blinken was interrupted by protestors, who called him a war criminal, and accused him of being involved in genocide. medical workers in israel have told the bbc that palestinian detainees from gaza are routinely being kept shackled to hospital beds, and forced to wear blindfolds and nappies. israel s army has said that restraints are only used when there s a security risk. this report, from our middle east correspondent lucy williamson, contains some details and images you may find distressing. sufiane abbuseleh survived months of war unscathed. he left military detention in israel permanently
possibility of limiting worldwide temperature rise to below the 1.5 degrees celsius? when we produced our landmark report five years ago, we said it was possible within the laws of physics and chemistry, and the biggest obstacle to keeping within the limit was actually on the social and institutional side. we, i think, now need to move to the position, we have to look very hard at whether we will be pushing against technical and economic barriers in terms of limiting warming to1.5. it is not absolutely impossible, but the chances are diminishing. and, really, it s hanging on a thread at the moment. right. isn t that a tactful way of saying, i m not in a position to be conclusive about this, but as far as i m concerned, as an experienced scientist, it is simply not going to happen ? the average temperature rise is going to go appreciably beyond 1.5. yeah, ipcc s job is to assess the literature that we have out there already, and we haven t got quite the literature yet to
thanks for the invite. it is great to have you in this studio. let s start with a blunt first question. is it time for the international community to junk this idea that there s any possibility of limiting worldwide temperature rise to below the 1.5 degrees celsius? when we produced our landmark report five years ago, we said it was possible within the laws of physics and chemistry, and the biggest obstacle to keeping within the limit was actually on the social and institutional side. we, i think, now need to move to the position, we have to look very hard at whether we will be pushing against technical and economic barriers in terms of limiting warming to1.5. it is not absolutely impossible, but the chances are diminishing. and, really, it s hanging on a thread at the moment. right. isn t that a tactful way of saying, i m not in a position to be conclusive about this, but as far as i m concerned, as an experienced scientist, it is simply not going to happen ? the average