and of violating the constitution by taking money from foreign governments and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who s mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what s political and start doing what s right. our country depends on it.
arment they needed to conduct a proper attack should there have been in that case. even if the green berets are operating in that manner to deescalate and make contact with local tribesmen, i did provide security for civil affairs groups and i understand that concept, we still should have had air power online, full communications everything we need in case something should happen. thanks very much for joining us. thank you. coming up, we ll have more on breaking news, president trump trying to distract from the russia probe saying the only collusion came from hillary clinton. can he make the investigations go away by changing the subject? new clues are revealed what top u.s. officials knew about the assassination of president kennedy. why is president trump still keeping some documents under wraps? stay with us. you re in the situation room. does not propose to conduct last them.
giveyou re finished! curse you, he-man, you interfering imbecile! give us one good reason we shouldn t vanquish you to another dimension! ok, guys, hear me out. switching to geico could save you. hundreds on car insurance. huh, he does make a point. i do like to save money. catch you on the flip, suckas! geico. because saving fifteen percent or more on car insurance is always a great answer. he s brought us to the obstructed justice at the fbi. and in direct violation of the constitution, he s taken money from foreign governments and threatened to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer and, like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something.
accused of obstructing justice to theat the fbinuclear war, and of violating the constitution by taking money from foreign governments and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who s mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what s political and start doing what s right. our country depends on it.
we saw sarah huckabee sanders a minute ago talking about how the president is pushing for transparency. comment on this case, but i m curious, are there other examples of presidents trying to get involved indecisions over the department of justice? or is this really unprecedented? really, as sarah huckabee sanders usually goes the other way. but on a bipartisan basis, presidents typically are trying to contain information in the executive branch. that s the usual behavior. so for the president to be encouraging this. and, look, there is a difference between him saying this is what he would like to see and giving a direct order. saying do it. that s right. and this is not crossed into that territory. nonetheless, when you are over in doj you know what the president wants, and you undoubtedly if it s plausible and reasonable to do t it s one more item on the scale in favor