accuser, beverly nelson and her attorney. the attorney demanding nelson release her high school yearbook for a handwriting analysis. moore s attorney trying to make the case that the christmas greeting signs love roy moore when he was 30 and she s 16 was not written by moore. you may remember on monday, miss nelson and miss alred really the only defense was a yearbook where they claimed it had been signed. they said specifically, look back at what they said. everything on that page they said was written by judge moore. now judge moore not only has denied everything she said before, but now flatly denies that and he says it s not true. he released a copy of the 1999 divorce papers. moore was the judge assigned to the case. now u the attorney claims moore s signature on the document does not match the one in nelson s yearbook.
think beverly even knew who the judge was. are you saying that roy moore signed a dismissal order. signed the documents but she never saw him or appeared in front of him? before him? yes. because what happened, katy, was, that her attorney filed for a dismissal of the case, because the parties had reconciled. so there was no hearing, because in alabama, when that happens, no hearing is necessary, and what happened was, judge moore signed the order of dismissal. under alabama rules, i am told, it is not necessary if the case is dismissed for there to be a hearing, and for the parties to present themselves at the hearing. if independent analysis shows that is not his signature, does that disprove your client s
if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who s mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what s political and start doing what s right. our country depends on it. another day of work. why do you do it? it s not just a pay check, you actually like what you do. even love it. and today, you can do things you never could before.
if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who s mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what s political and start doing what s right. our country depends on it. welcome back. it is time for the lid. the panel is back with us, joel benson, gabe i m not going to
russia. that is uranium one. while all of this goes on, of course, so does the mueller investigation. now honingb in on the west wing. robert mueller will question or has already questioned communications director hope hicks, son-in-law jared kushner, special counsel don mugan. for more we re joined now by julia ansley and jeremy bash, as you may have noticed, has agreed to stick around with us for this part of the conversation. julia, about the toej hez the attorney general at the end of it day, and this is tough road for him to walk. because he knows from the law, probably knows better in this case, and yet the pressure i mentioned from the right. exactly. and has spoken to have a lot of people who has said jeff sessions is doing something really politically smart right now, by asking career prosecutors to do this. these are people going to look at the facts of the case and probably find there s nothing