questions. and krishna, how might the attorney general respond to this? kendall is saying he should respond. as you look at this occurrence in the past where you have elected official requesting information from attorney general, what might that tell us about what happened in this case? my guess is, you know, if he is someone who has brought up executive privilege before, i don t think appropriately, but certainly brought it up, i think you might start seeing him hide behind that. i think these are very difficult questions for him to answer. he has not been truthful. he has not been truthful with congress on the russia issue. and just looking at more yeah, not been truthful so far. and a lana, last 15 seconds to you, i m sorry to do this to you, certainly shows that elected on the hill are becoming more and more impatient with this process. keep an eye on chairman grassley. he takes over iesight very
our country depends on it. accused of obstructing justice to theat the fbinuclear war, and of violating the constitution by taking money from foreign governments and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger
(toots) but you know it s you. so know this. the activated charcoal in charco caps adsorbs gas for fast gas relief without passing the gas. charco caps: put less boom in the room. for fast gas relief without passing the gas. accused of obstructing justice to theat the fbinuclear war, and of violating the constitution by taking money from foreign governments and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something.
he would mime about shooting him in the head. that itself might have had a prejudicial outcome on the sentencing. but once trump was president, and he was asked about bowe bergdahl, he couldn t resist. he told reporters that he wanted to remind them of what he said about bergdahl during the campaign. and bingo, just like that, the president personally ensured that some measure of lean yens would be shown to bowe bergdahl because of president trump and his inadult to not talk about this case. and in fact, the judge gave notice earlier that the president s inability to stop himself from talking about bowe bergdahl, that would be seen as mitigating evidence in deciding bergdahl s sentence. and bowe bergdahl was sentenced today. he was sentenced to a loss in rank. a fine.
dishonorable discharge. but no prison time. prosecutors asked for 14 years, he got none. and upon that sentence being handed down today in consideration of the mitigating evidence of the president trying to weigh in on how bergdahl should be treated, once that was handed down today, the president did it again. he put out a public response as president, as commander in chief, calling it a complete and total disgrace to our country and to our military. and i hope that felt great to the president to get that off his chest. but you know what? the practical effect of him getting that off his chest is bergdahl s lawyers will use that in their appeal. and because everybody in the military has to answer to the commander in chief and he s now expressed his personal displeasure with the sentence in this case, that means that further legal proceedings against bowe bergdahl will also have to mitigate against the impact of the president s