a defendant s right to a fair trial and they said that there there had to be a new trial but as you put it what can be done? the whole jury pool here is the ones that would have heard trump s tweet which is to say the entire country. profession ar harry litman, thank you both for joining us tonight. thank you. thank you. coming up, back when it was different. back when the president of the united states would never, never comment on a pending criminal case, even if it was a case of assassination.
ask your doctor about anoro. go your own way get your first prescription free at anoro.com. accused of obstructing justice to theat the fbinuclear war, and of violating the constitution by taking money from foreign governments and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who s mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility
uh huh! let it go! whoo! get a dollar-for-dollar match at the end of your first year. only from discover. accused of obstructing justice to theat the fbinuclear war, and of violating the constitution by taking money from foreign governments and threatening to shut down news organizations that report the truth. if that isn t a case for impeaching and removing a dangerous president, then what has our government become? i m tom steyer, and like you, i m a citizen who knows it s up to us to do something. it s why i m funding this effort to raise our voices together and demand that elected officials take a stand on impeachment. a republican congress once impeached a president for far less. yet today people in congress and his own administration know that this president is a clear and present danger who s mentally unstable and armed with nuclear weapons. and they do nothing. join us and tell your member of congress that they have a moral responsibility to stop doing what s political and star
is prejudice the legal rights of any person in any circumstances. he went on to say to set the record straight i do not know and did not intend to speculate as to whether the tate defendants are guilty in fact or not. all of the facts in the case have not yet been presented. the defendants should be presumed to be innocent at this stage of their trial. ron klain, richard nixon was a smart lawyer stepping into that mistake on his own and correcting it as fast as he could because he understood what was at stake. yeah. so once again trump is following the nixon example and not even living up to the nixon example and feels like a recurring theme, lawrence. this is a serious problem. as harry alluded to, there is a problem of prejudice of jury pool and bigger problem with regard to the federal government to seek the death penalty because the justice department has to explain how that decision was made, has to show it s free
were russians talking to the campaign? and it s clear that he knew that that was the case. at least in the terms of this papadopoulos meeting, trying to broker an arrangement between putin and trump. members of congress are saying, wait a second here, how can you claim ignorance of this did? it does seem that having had to recuse yourself for a statement that was misleading at best, and outright false at worst in that original hearing, when you come back to clean it up, going back through e-mail traffic or notes to say, actually, i was at this meeting i mean, the best thing would have been to say, i was at this meeting where someone broached this and i said, that s a bad idea. you end up looking like the good guy. but that s not what happened in that testimony, correct? that is correct. the other question here of course is, did papadopoulos pass on to anyone at the came pan the offer he got from his russian friends of dirt on hillary clinton and thousands of e-mails? it s incleef