business interests in russia? an active investigation? just as a no comment to a reporter doesn t mean yes or no in response to the reporter s questions. when someone says i can t talk about that here, that s all it means. it doesn t mean, yes, you re onto something and i ll tell you something juicy about it in closed session. it means i can t discuss it without getting into classified material or getting into talking about an ongoing investigation. that is really a lot means. sometimes it s hard to believe that s all it means though. isn t it a fact that michael flynn lied to the fbi? i can t reveal the internal fbi investigation, senator, even though that part would not technically be classified, it s an ongoing investigation and i can t reveal that. ms. yates, do you have any evidence, are you aware of any
a month prescription in two days. joining me now is care reerie, director of the documentary. i was struck by so many things. all four of the people, the families that you highlight, all of their addictions started with legitimate prescriptions. that is startling. but maybe it shouldn t be surprising. that s exactly right. that s really one of the reasons that we made this documentary in the first place. i think for too long the narrative has been that this epidemic is about bad people abusing good drugs that were meant for pain patients. it just isn t the case. this is good people struggling with the disease of addiction and we ve got to change that narrative. everybody in this film started with a prescription . it doesn t mean that s where stay th stayed. in this journey, do you see a fix? the government, the president wants to put more is asking for more pomoney to put at it, t is more money the answer?
jong-un. he s going to do what he has to do but understanding we are not going to be very happy. i will tell you a man aye gotten to like and are the, referring to the president of china, will not be happy either. as rebecca was saying he s looking for an ally and trying to minimum-wage thassage that r. every time i see him talking like this i think of him as a real estater. it kinds of like blushing on trying to get the price down on what you want to buy and the price up of what you want to sell. i see him in that mode when he s trying to publicly new yorker. it doesn t mean, as abbey points out, that rex tillerson isn t willing to sit down and start talks. but i think donald trump is going to be the lead bluffer on all of this. he s made it clear that he prefers a diplomatic solution
nafta because we have to. hours away from signing executive order to pull out of nafta and somebody came in and said let me point out to you where people who like nafta live. he changed his tune. i m slightly skeptical of the narrative. the perdue narrative? all of the details are true. it doesn t mean the president was about to go do this and pulled back from the brink. it is true people in the white house thought this is where the president was going. he was going down the path. i think the president tends to be more strategic in his mind. he will let aides think he is going to a certain place and change his mind. there was an intervention. third time we are talking about this. a split within the west wing on what to do. that doesn t mean the president was whip sawed. what does the president want to do? he wants to win. of course. this is confusing. 14 million jobs would be
it doesn t mean . good. it may be good for me but i m not sure there s a lot of like coal workers. anderson, i want you and every american to prosper. i m glad kirsten is here because it was the reagan/clinton combination in truth that brought down the deficit, that balanced the budget eventually, that caused about 20 years of economic growth. do you really believe these tax cuts will pay for themselves? you have to have the cuts in spending to go with them, and therein was ronald reagan s political problem. the democrats controlled both well, particularly the house. they controlled the house, they didn t control the senate for the first six years but they controlled the house which controls the purse strings and they weren t going there. that was tip o neill and they weren t going down that path. that was the problem. when the house finally came under the control of republicans with newt gingrich and bill clinton was in the white house, that is exactly what happened. we