Page 4 - J Matthew Wright News Today

U.S. v. Rahimi will be yet another “Oopsie, our bad” ruling from some members of the Supreme Court's conservative supermajority.

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court seemed likely Tuesday to preserve a federal law that prohibits people under domestic violence restraining orders from having guns.In<a class="excerpt-read-more" href="https://wsvn.com/news/politics/the-supreme-court-seems-likely-to-preserve-a-gun-law-that-protects-domestic-violence-victims/">Read More</a>

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar falsely claims a federal gun ban "requires individualized findings of dangerousness."

Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar falsely claims a federal gun ban "requires individualized findings of dangerousness."

The government can disarm "dangerous individuals" without violating the Second Amendment, U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar told the Supreme Court on…

The U.S. Supreme Court isn't required by its recently adopted historical analog test to upend a federal statute prohibiting persons subject to domestic violence restraining orders from possessing firearms if no similar law was on the books in the 1800s, two former clerks to conservative justices argue in a new paper, claiming the test's flexibility has been overlooked.

It was only a year ago that the Supreme Court issued a landmark Second Amendment opinion that expanded gun rights nationwide and established that firearms rules must be consistent with the nation’s “historical tradition.”

It was only a year ago that the Supreme Court issued a landmark Second Amendment opinion that expanded gun rights nationwide and established that firearms rules must be consistent with the nation’s “historical tradition.”

The Supreme Court's conservatives agree the 2nd Amendment provides individual gun rights. But does it protect those accused of domestic violence?

The Supreme Court's conservatives agree the 2nd Amendment provides individual gun rights. But does it protect those accused of domestic violence?