a lot of money flowed back into the clinton foundation coffers. sure. based on some of these deals allegedly. what most foundations do receive especially international foundations receive international funding. that s a separate issue. voters care about do i have a job? are we going to war? are we going to go broke do we. do you care if countries like saudi arabia or some of the other muslim based countries who have atrocious records with women s rights, do you care that she took some of that money. personally i do of course. how about you, jennice, do you care? as long as the money went to good use, i don t think so. you don t care that the money was raised in countries where women s rights are just violated rampantly? if those if that money went to help a woman anywhere else in the world i m happy they put that money to good use. we don t have to agree, no foundation has to agree 100% on the donor. on your point on bergdahl i want to say that we should be clear th
presidential contender you have to trust that when they give you stuff that that s it. you can t go where is it? you can t do that. well, if you want to double-check it with somebody, then i learned this actually from marlin fits water who is press secretary to reagan and george bush 41. you ask the secretary of defense the same question that you ask the national security advisor in same rooms. if they give you the same answer you are good to go to the podium. if they don t there is a problem. jennice, how would you defend hillary clinton? well, i would say it s a little brouhaha to use your word. why is this a story? this is a story because being very transparent and all of that information on the foundation s web site. they did not have to disclose they do not even take anonymous donations which they are allowed. i don t think it s going to be the big thing. i think it s going to be the email thing. you can make up your own mind whether you are
true? let s start with amnesty because there is some points i don t have you were looking down so i can t look at the points. let s look at amnesty. you mentioned the word amnesty the last time we had amnesty was under ronald reagan. great republican president right? amnesty back in the day back then was you paid, you got your name down, and you got your green card. this is what we are talking about, please, let s be clear, this is not amnesty. what was attached to the reagan amnesty jennice? very little. there was no background there was no fingerprinting, there was no fine. you didn t have to pay a fine. no. what was attached to the amnesty under president reagan was this will be the last time we will do it. we will secure the border. we are not going to have any more of this and the government obviously let us down. true. did you see that i distorted this editorial as jennice seems to think that i distorted it. i didn t distort anything. you were presenting it in the
wants. because that ideology sees the american judeo-christian tradition as oppressive, exploitative and a white privilege legacy. thus, the uber left wants traditional america wiped off the face of the earth. that s what s truly going on. and if americans don t wise up quickly the left wing vision of immigration may very well become a reality. that s the memo. now for the top story reaction. joining us from washington, two democrats simon rosenberg and jennice friend as fen as it. is extreme white ring analysis. i m taking it right from the paper. these are the words they wrote. i didn t change any of the words. i just put them on the scheen. okay. let s just look at history. no, no, no. i don t want to look at history. i want to look at the new york times story. are you saying this is not
give me one example, go. fz yes, indeed. mental co-is sending rapists, drug dealers and criminals. mexico with israel. israel is sending rapists, drug dealers and criminals. would that make you upset? would that remove from mr. trump? come on, let s be honest about the discussion here. this is not even immigrant. all mexicans in with the group. this is really. nobody would ever allege that was sane that israel does that. but in mexico, as you well know. no, no. no using a comparison. jennice, are you going to listen to the question? yes, i will. okay. i m glad. in mexico, tons of narcotics come from that country into the united states that s a fact. mexican federals are bribed. that s a fact. there is more context here than you are making out. reuben, what do you think about the attempt to it stifle donald trump?