Interest who are outside of the 150 radius for the 311 notification. They are encouraging the commission to consider an alternative plan design by a neighbor that would reduce the rear massing. The Residential Design Team first reviewed the proposal in march and again after the dr was filed. They determined that there are no exception or extraordinary circumstances to the project that is as presented to the Planning Commission and in this abbreviated format, staffs recommendation to the commission is to not take discretionary review and approve the Building Permit, that concludes my presentation. Thank you. Dr requester, your team has five minutes. Thank you, geek,president wu and members of the Commission Im susan holey and im representing the dr requester. As staff mentioned the request is support by a petition of 59 area residents most of them within the 150 radius and othersust beyond it in the neighborhood, as well as 30 letters from concerned neighbors. I wasnt able to hear all o
In opposition, including one from the upper noe Neighbors Group and a petition with 59 signatures. This included several residents on the south side of the duncan street and further down on 27th interest who are outside of the 150 radius for the 311 notification. They are encouraging the commission to consider an alternative plan design by a neighbor that would reduce the rear massing. The Residential Design Team first reviewed the proposal in march and again after the dr was filed. They determined that there are no exception or extraordinary circumstances to the project that is as presented to the Planning Commission and in this abbreviated format, staffs recommendation to the commission is to not take discretionary review and approve the Building Permit, that concludes my presentation. Thank you. Dr requester, your team has five minutes. Thank you, geek,president wu and members of the Commission Im susan holey and im representing the dr requester. As staff mentioned the request is su
No exception or extraordinary circumstances to the project that is as presented to the Planning Commission and in this abbreviated format, staffs recommendation to the commission is to not take discretionary review and approve the Building Permit, that concludes my presentation. Thank you. Dr requester, your team has five minutes. Thank you, geek,president wu and members of the Commission Im susan holey and im representing the dr requester. As staff mentioned the request is support by a petition of 59 area residents most of them within the 150 radius and othersust beyond it in the neighborhood, as well as 30 letters from concerned neighbors. I wasnt able to hear all of the last discussion because of the problems with the capacity of the room and the next item that is coming up, but i did see the beginning and it appears there are some overlapping issues in terms of midblock open space and the blocking nature of the building, but our issue is much simpler than the one you were dealing w
Just one more time, you can see it. There is the project site. Carrie and andrew, up the hill. You can see the stepping. Oh, im sorry, im georgia and live at 460 duncan. There is a very important part of the neighbors alternative that you are getting now, that you need to see, please. Here is the floor plan for the third floor of the neighbors alternative. Contrary to what was thought, the neighbors alternative allows for the creation of a threebedroom house, not a twobedroom, but a threebedroom on one level. This is the neighbors alternative with the setbacks, but inside. It should be perfectly acceptable for any contemporary modern family that may be lucky enough to live there, if the commission makes a motion to approve the neighbors alternative. Its lack of neighborhood preservation and lack of compliance with the rd did g. Its just too big. Whatever the Commission Approves is the approval action under ceqa as stated on the agenda . The front of the house is basically preserved and
It extends to the 45 required rear yard and beyond that a one story bump out extends it another 8 into the required rear yard as allowable as an allowable obstruction under section 1 36 of the code. The subject building currently is one of the shallowest in depth on this block and will be increased in Square Footage from 1600 to 3849 square feet. This written dimension has been corrected on the plans originally it had 3150 square feet. The property constructed in 1905 was evaluated by the preservation staff and found to be a contributor to a district under ceqa. Changes to the original design occurreds a result of the Historic Resource determination to adhere to the secretary of interiorase standards for rehabilitation. The project as revised meets all the preservation and planning code requirements and does not require further environmental review. Because of the property has been found to be a resource, the property had stricter demolition requirements to retain the original cottage