misrepresentations, we have lying about the context of the conversations. we have tweets that are designed to take your eye off the ball. those are not the acts of a party that knows they are innocent. congressman we are out of time. i have to ask you, you said that you and the intelligence committee have begun to get documents and transcripts. have you gotten the transcripts between the trump officials and the russian officials that you just discussed? dana, i can t discuss the specifics of when we have and don t have. this stuff is all highly classified. the important point we will get those documents, we will hopefully get testimony from people like director comey and others. but the key thing to remember is we are in very early days and nobody should be prejudging the conclusion these investigations might yield. can t hurt a girl for trying. appreciate it. up next, president trump s evidence-free claims of wiretapping are just the latest in a series of conspiracy
conversations were picked up in trump tower, the big question, which all these investigations are centering on, which is whether there was communication between the trump organization and the russians. that points us in one direction. otherwise it is just an unhinged president tweeting insanity early in the morning. congressman, i just want to follow on one thing that you said. you said it definitely wasn t the president, meaning president obama, who ordered the wiretap. lets assume that is fact. you are not ruling out the notion of the fisa court for the fbi that wiretapping going on inside trump tower threw official changs channels during the obama administration? there is three ways there could be doshs of the least three ways but the three ways that matter here in which there could be a wiretap on trump
said, it s a big claim. and we should take it seriously if the president of the united states is saying that. we should look into it, see if there is anything there or not. if not, i imagine he will be rebuked. would you be one to rebuke him if there is no evidence that comes to the fore? absolutely. absolutely. congressman. let s talk about the travel ban the president signed today, the revised travel ban. mm-hmm. you agreed with the president at the beginning with taking a pause, but you had a problem with some of his rhetoric at the time. do you support what you have seen today, the revisions, taking iraq out, for example, and making clear that people who have green cards and so forth are excluded from this? well, i agree i still disagree with the rhetoric that happened before, but i certainly agree with taking a pause. i think it s important to keep in mind and yes, you re right, it is important that folks with green cards who are here legally are not