Announcer washington joirnl continues. Host we are joined by james zirin the author of supremely partisan, how raw politics tips the scales in the u. S. Supreme court. He is here to discuss his book which argues that the Supreme Court has become increasingly partisan in the cases he says were politicized and threatened to undermine Public Confidence in the court. Thanks for joining us this morning. Guest im delighted to be here. Host so what inspired you to write this book . Guest i was a practicing lawyer. I of course followed the Supreme Court for many years. And i became alarmed in recent years reading the cases at the 54 decisions and the 63 decisions, which seemed to be decided along partisan lines. So that you had the liberal wing of the court, all justices appointed by democratic president s, and the conservative wing all appointed by republican president s. And they were taking political positions, which could easily be identified with the ideas of the respective parties that a
Controlled by republicans. Recent polls show that americans are growing tired of divided government which brings us to todays question for our viewers. Do you believe divided government can work . Those who prefer one party rule over both the executive and congressional branches can call 2027488001. Those who prefer a divided government can call 2027488000. And those who are undecided can call 2027488002. You can also reach us on social media on twitter and on acebook. Host americans are growing increasingly dissatisfied with the diving board divided government. It says one in five americans believe its best for the president to be in one political party. The lowest level of public support in gallups 15year trend. Host it says its showing that one Party Control is falling out of favor. This is likely because Many Americans have witnessed the government increasingly in gridlock believing that legislation will get passed only if there is one party in scroll that party pushes it through.
Trump as a practicing lawyer i followed the Supreme Court for many years and became alarmed in recent years reading the cases of the 54 decisions and the 63 decisions which seemed to be decided along partisan line so had the liberal wing of the court, all aopinioned by democratic president s and the conservative wing all appointed by republican president s, and they were taking political positions which could easily be identified with the ideas of the respective parties. Oducti about thing wed care bit. Excerp rights and preproductive rights. Lets look an an exert. You say the courts dramatic porlarization is a recipe for the undermining of our greatest institution and has not been fully appreciated by most otherwise well insured americans. What did you mean by that . Guest theres lessis confidence in the decision and to public at large doesntt accept their decisions and afte, all, the Supreme Court is alexander hamilton, doesnt have an army, doesnt have any money so its power comes fr
The Hill Hits an All-Time Low With Outrageous Headline Suggesting Donald Trump Could Be 'Hung' twitchy.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from twitchy.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Following the drone strike on a U.S. base in Jordan, panelists discuss the possibility of a U.S. military response as well as the implications of conflict spreading in the region. BRANNEN: Thanks so …