problematic authoritarian tendencies throughout the society. now, that warning was followed by the announcement of that year s pulitzer prize for national reporting which went to the new york times or and the washington post, for quote relentlessly reported coverage in the public interest on russian interference in the 2016 election,ru and its connectionso the trump campaign, the president-elect transition team, and his eventual administration. now that choice naturally drew the ire of then president donald trump, who did not stop complaining about the decision, even after he left the white house. it actually led the pulitzer board to open two separate independent investigations into the awarding of those prizes. and this week, the pulitzer board has announced the results of those investigations, and here is part of what they said. no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that subsequent to the con fe
today if the d.o.j. has the necessary resources and he responded that the department could always use more resources, but that it can still accomplish its mission and that the people at d.o.j. are committed to it. how does that square with your own reporting of what is happening behind the scenes? well, no matter how you cut it, this is just a massive, massiveou investigation. already, the justice department has brought almost 900, charges against almost 900 people and those are folks who are sort of directly involved in the events of that day. so we expect there to be more arrests. and we expectex there to be, wh looks to be an expanding investigation. the attorney general as you noted today said that the justice department could always use more resources for, this but as recently as march, we saw, you know, a job posting go up, seeking more prosecutors to work on the elements of this investigation, and we know that there has been a prosecutor assigned from maryland, and thomas wynd