Cord ordinance that is in your committee, supervisor. Thats why only in front of you today is the land use portion. Were also talking about that in rules tomorrow. Great. Another question i having toling back and forth between ing toling back ing toggling back and forth. I dont think we rae solved that. I know supervisor kim and Public Health did bring up issues around employee whose may be exposed to this long term every day and want fog make sure there are proper requirements in place. So i know that last week, supervisor sheehy had an amendment on page 11 that had no reference to dph. It says we allow for on site consumption. Yet, when i read the operation the legislation piece pending in rules committee, i know there may be forthcoming amendments, i want to make sure its consistent. What id like to separate here is the process by which consumption is validated by the department of Public Health. We have eight sites right now where cannabis is consumed. The department at San Francis