and completely reviewed what the impacts of all of this development has been on the neighborhood? i am curious. i know you have been really involved in neighborhood planning for the last 20 years and the last time the city reviewed the cumulative pedestrian traffic issues as you pointed out was in 1992 yerba buena eir. so from your perspective, what do you feel has happened or can you outline what you feel has happened over the last 20 years that has impacted pedestrian traffic and safety in the neighborhood? thank you, supervisor. the last time the city redevelopment agency looked at a list of actual projects and tried to estimate their impacts, was in 1992 and left out and could not have foreseen many of the huge projects that have been built or now pending. it did conceptually envision a new museum of modern art, but certainly not the popular one built and the expansion approved a few months ago that would double its size again. it did not envision the construction of th
simply say it is a remarkable project at a remarkable time, adaptive reuse to the kind of use that complements market octavia n. civic center. it is close to a strike of genius, i think. i am extremely happy to support all of the positive aspects which were eloquently summarized. i am not normally as supportive of things, because we are here to quickly take things under the microscope. in this case, all of the questions we are concerned about are answered. we did not prod the developer, but the developer delivered them. this creates units on site, which is what we would like in almost all projects. it delivers below the requirements for car spaces, based on the market octavia plan. there is bike parking, there is car share. there is consideration of environmental performance and win the baffling. the list goes on. eight or 10 items, which are a closer examination doable he offered a persuasive adaptive reuse. i would agree with the department attempt to continue the discuss
here are not all trying to attract attention on themselves, but create a harmonious setting which operates at the ground floor as well as the upper skyline they will create together. this building will be one of the first tall buildings at this intersection. i very much of forward to see the department worked with the architect and some of the other commissioners to continue the dialogue. commissioner sugaya: i have one question, i think, either for staff or the project sponsor, about the other building that has been mentioned. have we had any inquiries about that particular property? not that one. my understanding, and others can correct me if i am wrong, is that the original facade was ripped off when the green glass was applied, unfortunately. the interior spaces are intact, but the exterior no longer exists that was originally on the building. commissioner sugaya: i support the project and would move to approve with conditions, and with the understanding that there will
commissioner moore: i would simply say it is a remarkable project at a remarkable time, adaptive reuse to the kind of use that complements market octavia n. civic center. it is close to a strike of genius, i think. i am extremely happy to support all of the positive aspects which were eloquently summarized. i am not normally as supportive of things, because we are here to quickly take things under the microscope. in this case, all of the questions we are concerned about are answered. we did not prod the developer, but the developer delivered them. this creates units on site, which is what we would like in almost all projects. it delivers below the requirements for car spaces, based on the market octavia plan. there is bike parking, there is car share. there is consideration of environmental performance and win the baffling. the list goes on. eight or 10 items, which are a closer examination doable he offered a persuasive adaptive reuse. i would agree with the department att
it is close to a strike of genius, i think. i am extremely happy to support all of the positive aspects which were eloquently summarized. i am not normally as supportive of things, because we are here to quickly take things under the microscope. in this case, all of the questions we are concerned about are answered. we did not prod the developer, but the developer delivered them. this creates units on site, which is what we would like in almost all projects. it delivers below the requirements for car spaces, based on the market octavia plan. there is bike parking, there is car share. there is consideration of environmental performance and win the baffling. the list goes on. eight or 10 items, which are a closer examination doable he offered a persuasive adaptive reuse. i would agree with the department attempt to continue the discussion on some of the elements of the exterior design, including color. however, i am extremely supportive and laudatory of the situation, taking