changes potentially rely on enforcement. and i don t see that enforcement happening. you know, mta paid a lot of money to the police department every year, even after the current budget goes into effect. and i just don t see i just don t see that happening. i ll say the same with double parking. we have an absolute you know, epidemic of double parking everywhere in the city and that screws up muni. it screws up biking. it messes up a lot of thing. and that s sfpd and mta lack of enforcement. he you don t see enforcement even on major corridors where a delivery truck is double parked and stopping an entire muni line in its tracks. is there a sense that we re going to see those kind of improvements? because some of these short term trials and even the longer term are going to be very reliant on effective enforce many by mta and by sfpd. yeah, that s definitely something we re trying to account for for the design. we want to the greatest extent possible have self-enforcing
do. we can go over it right now piece by piece if you want. there s not necessarily spending commitved for all of them, but we can show which ones aren t, or we can follow-up with you. i would love it if there were some brief answers on that to start the conversation if folks can. so, supervisors, i think four weeks ago we sent you a near term list with projects that were funded and what were not funded. and, so, i would like to refer to that list. the first page, it has a list of all the projects that we have funding for and the ones we re still seeking funding. in terms of near term projects or even potential pilots. great. i think the ones that i m particularly interested in are around the shared auto restrictionses and delivery truck restrictions and traffic i guess traffic enforcement we ve already covered, but looks like on the document that i have from a couple months ago it s 10, 11 and 12. and i do see potential budgets there, but i just want to get a sense