Latest Breaking News On - John yu - Page 10 : vimarsana.com
that crime is never mentioned in the indictment. that's a serious flaw. donald trump may be able to get out of this case because of the failure of this indictment of the timing of the crime. what crime is it and if it is a federal crime, i don't think bragg is able to prosecute the federal crime. this is one of the many legal flaws that are afflicting with this indictment. >> i am not a legal expert but a lot of legal experts agree with you as well. mr. bragg owes the public a better explanation of he is theory of the case. his unclear invasive reply on tuesday does not help. the country does not have to wait four months to find out the answer. bragg at the news conference today did not know how to answer these questions, john. >> or he just did not want to. this indictment is so legally insufficient that apart of me is wondering whether or not alvin bragg
IndictmentTrumpCrimeBrian-kohberger-caseFlawFailureTimingLotOneFlawsExpertsThink-braggit has no nutritional value. there is nothing there. >> is slurpee the proper analogy here? >> i get his point. what he's saying here is if you read the indictment, you can't tell what trump did that was illegal. it is all seems to be coming later. this is a problem constitutionally. the purpose of indictment, the reason and the constitution gives you due process rights that you as a criminal defendant, trump, have the right to know what the government is charging you with. you read this indictment, you can't tell what's illegal and what's a felony. so, i agree. it has no content to it. and it may be constitutional vulnerable on appeal. >> john, we hear this all the time that nobody is above the law. this time the former president is below the law. a normal person would not have been facing these
NothingPointSlurpeeAnalogyValueIndictmentProblemReasonWhatPurposeTrumpFelonyami documents. it is not just that $130,000 wired payment. >> however, many legal scholars have been quick to point out that while the charges say that the 34 false business records conceal another crime, the indictment never says what that crime is. bragg claims the law does not require him to do so. now, you will remember at one point, bragg did hesitate to prosecute this case but then referred to new details allegedly prompted a push forward. while the judge says he wants to move expeditiously, the next hearing is early december. >> kevin corke live for us in d.c. thank you. let's bring our law officer john yu. john, i want to play some
ChargesPaymentBusiness-recordsAmi-documentsScholars3000013000034IndictmentCrimeBrian-kohberger-caseLawsound. this is the former president tonight, he made a good point and i will get your take. >> everybody says this is not really an indictment, there is nothing here. there is nothing here. they're not saying what you did. >> he's right, john. they did not disclose the crime. >> not one darn thing. >> sorry, john yu, go ahead. [laughter] >> it is okay. we look alike, too. we are like twins. >> separated at birth. >> the problem of this indictment has a big hole and as what kevin said, it does not describe the crime. without that description of the crime, all you have got are a munch of misdemeanors, the clock ran out over five years ago on charges. they're not even that serious. you don't go to a grand jury. the only way you can get to a felony is the cooking of the books have to be concealed of other crimes.
IndictmentPresidentNothingJohn-yuPointEverybodyTakeSoundCrimeThingLaughterOnecharges. your final thoughts. >> yeah, the law is not applicable in this case. you know we are all above the law if the law does not apply to us. one more thing, i am ashamed that alvin bragg duped a grand jury. we should not be allow to indict a ham sandwich or a potted plant or a pair of sox. we should only indict people when there is probable cause of a crime. this is not that. >> yeah, it is a very one-sided document. jonna spilbor and john yu, thank you. a bit of a circus today. nate is live in manhattan with that side of the story. nate, good evening. . >> reporter: good evening, trace, what a day it has been for former president trump. you saw part of his defiant speech in mar-a-lago. his day started differently here in new york city. while coming down here to the courthouse for his arr
Brian-kohberger-caseLawThingChargesThoughtsDa-alvin-braggAmericaOneCrimePeoplePlantGrand-jury>> neil: here we go. you are looking live at lower manhattan. quiet now. come next tuesday, likely anything but. that is when donald j. trump comes to the big apple for the big arraignment. what we're told could be a 34 count indictment. there he will be booked, read his miranda rights, fingerprinted and have his mug shot taken. he will not be handcuffed. an allowance for being a former president. regardless, it's a first for a former president or for that matter any president. a good time to talk to a former vice president. in fact, donald trump's vice president, mike pence. he's here. what he makes of this indictment. john yu on why so many counts to this indictment. charlie gasparino on how big donors are playing this indictment. historian dougly brinkley on how everything just changed with this indictment. first, fox team coverage with bryan llenas outside the manhattan da's office with the latest on the charges.
Donald-j-trumpIndictmentCountArraignmentAnythingLower-manhattanBig-apple34PresidentFirstMugFingerprintedcampaign finance violation. >> neil: interesting. thanks. john yoo. i want to go to charlie gasparino. he's been talking to the big money guys in the republican party and where they may be shifting or not shifting. what are you hearing? >> they're not shifting yet. if you talk to them, they say it's a zoo a circus, they can't believe this is happening over the stormy daniels payment. on top of it all, it's one of the least respected da's in the country, alvin bragg, who let's face it, a lot of crimes go unpunished here in new york city. here's what they think. the republican donor base desperately does not want donald trump to be the gop nominee. they think if there's one person that could lose to joe biden in 2024, it's donald trump for all the reasons that you have stated in the past. not because of this case, but a lot of other stuff. he turns off suburban woman. we don't have to litigate that
Neil-cavutoThanksRepublicanCharlie-gasparinoBig-money-guysJohn-yuCampaign-finance-violationDaStormy-danielsPaymentTopZoo-a-circus