Page 2 - Jon Sarch News Today

Students at Roaring Fork High School heard oral arguments made to a three-judge panel of Colorado Court of Appeals on Tuesday as part of the Colorado’s Courts in the Community program. Judges heard appeals in...

Students at Roaring Fork High School heard oral arguments made to a three-judge panel of Colorado Court of Appeals Tuesday as part of the Colorado Court of Appeals’ Courts in the Community program.

The Colorado Supreme Court will likely wait until next year before deciding whether to make it more difficult for attorneys to dismiss people of color from criminal jury trials for reasons that, while not explicitly racial, may still correlate with their race.

The Colorado Supreme Court has joined an apparent minority of its peers across the country in laying down a written transition plan for chief justices, who are executive leaders of the judicial branch in addition to their roles deciding cases.

A special tribunal has issued an unprecedented public censure of former Colorado Supreme Court Chief Justice Nathan "Ben" Coats for violating the state’s judicial code of conduct when he allowed a $2.75 million contract with a former top courts administrator.

The 16-page document posted Monday morning on the Colorado Supreme Court website says “the Special Tribunal hereby publicly censures you, former Chief Justice Nathan B. Coats, for violating Colorado Code of Judicial Conduct Canon Rule.”

Home Media Press Releases Release Colorado Court of Appeals to hear arguments at Pueblo Community College on April 25 Friday, April 21, 2023 DENVER – A division

A Colorado man who marched to the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 and then sued 9News' Kyle Clark for defamation over subsequent news coverage settled the lawsuit days before the case had been set to be argued before the Colorado Court of Appeals, according to court records.

A Colorado man who marched to the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6 and then sued 9News' Kyle Clark for defamation over subsequent news coverage settled the lawsuit days before the case had been set to be argued before the Colorado Court of Appeals, according to court records.

Virtual court proceedings enable lawyers to more easily represent clients at a lower cost, are less disruptive to the lives of litigants and are more technically demanding on judges and their courtrooms.Those were the broad messages contained in more than 200 pages of comments submitted to the Colorado Supreme Court on a pair of proposed directives governing remote access to judicial proceedings.