Page 20 - Jonathan Mitchell News Today

All eyes are on the U.S. Supreme Court, where the Justices just heard oral arguments in the Trump ballot ban case. The ACLJ filed its final brief earlier this week in the case. Now we wait to hear the Justices’ decision. Will the U.S. Supreme Court uphold the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to . . .

BY: JORDAN BOYD | FEBRUARY 08, 2024 Read more at https://thefederalist.com/2024/02/08/justice-jackson-shuts-down-after-trump-lawyer-explains-why-insurrection-mania-is-a-stupid-talking-point/ JORDAN BOYD VISIT ON TWITTER@JORDANBOYDTX MORE ARTICLES Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson quickly abandoned her “insurrection” questioning on Thursday when former President Donald Trump’s lawyer Jonathan Mitchell pointed out that the term, although used widely by corporate media, Democrats, ...

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Thursday heard two hours of historic arguments in a Colorado case to remove former President Donald Trump from the ballot. The justices sounded highly skeptical of the effort. It’s the first time that voters have tried to block a candidate from the presidency under a once-obscure post-Civil War […]

Posts about JONATHAN MITCHELL written by Jerry

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court seems poised to reject attempts to kick former President Donald Trump off the 2024 ballot, with conservative and liberal justices in apparent agreement in a

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments Thursday about whether former President Trump could be banned from the ballot this year. The case stems from a December ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court, which held that Trump should be struck from the GOP primary ballot in that state on the basis of the 14th Amendment. Section 3 of…

Most of the justices seemed dubious of a single state’s claim it could remove a federal candidate from the ballot.

Jonathan Mitchell is widely credited with helping create the legal framework around Texas’s strict anti-abortion law SB 8

People camped out overnight with hopes of getting a seat inside the U.S. Supreme Court to witness the historic arguments.

The prevailing view among legal experts before the Supreme Court heard argument in a case to remove Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot was that the justices wouldn't take that step.