Were told that he was shot several times in the head and in the chest. Medics tried to revive the boy, but there was nothing that they could do. He was pronounced a short time later and now with no motive,ly say theyre still trying to piece this case together. We know that the shooter was in pretty close proximity to the 17yearold victim. Now, from first responding officers and witnesses, at the time the shots were fired, there was a basketball game going on on the Basketball Court, and right next to the Basketball Court, they were having a cookout. Reporter now, police right now scouring the area for the shooter. Witnesses say that the suspect fired off at least ten shots before taking off down eighth street. Luckily, no one else was hurt, but detectives at this point tell us that they are checking surveillance cameras in the area that point down to the Basketball Court. Theyre hoping that theyre able that they will be able to gather some video from this shooting in order to find the
Second egress for a new unit that was being created and through the hard work of city planning Historical Preservation she was given such an, egress through the garage and now abandoned it this prevents us again from light, air and repair of our buildings and goes against the very issue that issue that is characteristic. Very wide alleyways between the buildings and that was a characteristic of the building between 1890 and 1915 and while she has claimed she wants to create other aspects of of the development on the roof weve never actually seen what the plans are. The side of the building is still planned to to be change and theres a permit she had withdrawn but appears to be coming back changing the entry system of the building to suit her new development and the environmental and Historical Preservation issues has a lot to do with the architecture and in fact whether those entry ways are going to be used now for the staircase from two two separate units. You have 7 minutes and 30 se
To redress our grievances. We were here on appeal exactly 27 months ago on the same project with part of the same issues that we face today in a manner that we call dejavo u. S. All over again or a variant on the play same time next year. The communities should be informed in total ity they are allowed to see what is to be built and for the last 2 years we have not been able to to do that. Once the project sponsor abandoned the plans immediately after our signing the agreement, she took 6 months to come up with a new set of plans we found out about in april and there after 7 permits have been issued on this job. The net effect for us has been that basically the fundamentals of the agreement since this is the oldest building in calhalos neighborhood our neighborhood 125 years old, it is part of a very Historic District of similar Historical Resource buildings our family home being next door on the south side side 2845 broderick and has both a social and arc arc tech turl history and wha
Bill 360 allowing counties to develop and own and operate public Voting Systems and opens the door for Voting Technology used to administer elections publicly available and viewable and by following the open source path we can ensure that elections have more integrity than they also have and less opportunity for fraud and more accurate results so this resolution will move us in in that direction by requesting that lafco study how San Francisco could implement its own Voting System and move towards open source. So this is an important step forward colleagues i want to acknowledge that weve all received some emails in the last few days from some advocates expressing concern not with the substance of the resolution i believe theres universal support for the substance of the resolution but expressing concern that one organization is named in the resolution and in the spirit of moving forward in in a united a way as possible because i believe the same goal im going to suggest or make a moti
An, egress through the garage and now abandoned it this prevents us again from light, air and repair of our buildings and goes against the very issue that issue that is characteristic. Very wide alleyways between the buildings and that was a characteristic of the building between 1890 and 1915 and while she has claimed she wants to create other aspects of of the development on the roof weve never actually seen what the plans are. The side of the building is still planned to to be change and theres a permit she had withdrawn but appears to be coming back changing the entry system of the building to suit her new development and the environmental and Historical Preservation issues has a lot to do with the architecture and in fact whether those entry ways are going to be used now for the staircase from two two separate units. You have 7 minutes and 30 seconds left. Were asking you to do the following things as a consensus of all the neighbors that we presented to supervisor farrell and i w