Racial classifications contradicts the 14th andments guarantee of equal treatment. It relied upon sah typical assumptions that race is necessarila proxy for ones viewpoint and its purported limi are empty and selfcontradictory, which is why it also creates many negativeem. Effects. Some applicants are instanof eyes to concear race. Others admitted on merit have their accomplishments diminished by saying celayed a role in their admission. In two decades, this has somehow reduced thro of race on campus. Mr. Strawbridge, the respondents are at if you dont consider race, you wont be able toonder the whole person in the admissions process. How do you respond to that . This court has always said that racial, it is possible that re uld provide context for experience, but just ering race and race alone is not consistent with the constitution. Is also not consistent with other holistic approaches at this court takes. There is great freedom, for example to strike a juro but one thing you cannot