That a businessman would have knowledge is limited in any when he is about to sign a transaction. But if you go after his integrity, right, if you go check. And by that he clearly meant after his public service, if you go after his military record, that President Trump was youre done. Thinking about or had in front but chuck, isnt there a high stakes problem with that, for of him the possibility of providing Security Assistance to trump and the republicans to say, because then the next question is, okay, who does know ukraine. It was similar to writing a check to someone who youre what trump said . Bolton and trump. About to send. He used that analogy very and they dont want those folks to come before congress. I absolutely agree. Im saying if there is a path to clearly to indicate that this try and point out that he has limited knowledge, thats the would be this would require path and its a narrow one. Something. If that person owed him does it ultimately work . No, it doesnt. Right.
this point forward. mr. ratliff, i am not objecting the question but i am in jukti instructing the witness they should not presume questions from the minority or majority may represents facts or evidence that s not correct. i i have answered your question and we ll resume to questions and the clock. you can appreciate president trump s concerns? i don t know the exact nature of president trump s concerns. in my deposition i recall you handed me the political article which listed at least three of the elements that you have described earlier. and you recognized and i confirmed with the minority members that first i heard of