Page 41 - June 3rd News Today

Thats how they portray what in effect is concealment in a false affidavit that was offered by trumps own attorney saying that they had done an adequate search and looked everywhere for all the classified documents. that did not happen. >> brandon, before we get out of here, what do you expect from the doj? w what will they do next? >> they will do what they continued to do. the special master at most is going to potentially withhold some small amount of documents ord delay it. the investigation ...

Christina bobb will automatically be a witness. she will be asked for testimony. well see about evan corcoran. >> so harry litman, let me ask you one key point of the trump filing is the claim that the june 3rd meeting between the justice department official and trumps attorneys, evan corcoran, christina bobb, was as the file put it significantly mischaracterized. how do the courts go about verifying which version is the truth? >> well, for now they dont have to. its funny, because all these sel...

Contained national security vital information and why even after they got a subpoena from a grand jury, they hid it from the government. theres no response to that from trump. >> devlin, you have laid out that timeline in "the washington post" along the way and pointing out just how often and how vigorously the government tried to get this stuff back, quietly, though, giving him special procedures because he is a former president. so not going after him the way they would anyone else, the subpoe...

Government in its response at page 3 to 14. however, movement will simply highlight that one specific event, the june 3rd 2022 meeting, has been significantly mischaracterized in the governments response. if the government provide the same untrue account in the affidavit in support of the search warrant, then they misled the magistrate judge. tell us more about what meeting theyre talking about, and why thats. important >> right, thats important because when we got the justice department, filing...

Interesting to note that it was the trump team that wants this to be made public, because they are seeking to have a better understanding of what one could say theyre trying to defend the former president against here. because it was a trump lawyer and a custodian of his records who, on june 3rd, signed a sworn affidavit that all relevant documents had been turned over to the department of justice. its not clear whether that signature was signed on the dotted lines with the understanding that, t...

The thing i was disappointed not to see was confirmation of "the new york times" reporting that there was, in fact, a written certification by a lawyer for the president saying everything that had been asked for had been turned over. we now know from the governments submission this week that there was a letter, and it was certified. and i was waiting to see in submission by the trump team last night how they would respond and explain away the fact that there was a sworn declaration that everythi...

National security of the united states may have been on the line which methods were exposed over the last year and a half or potentially into the future because of where these documents where. thats where i think its important that trump and his allies and his lawyers are not denying these documents existed over the course of the last two months after june 3rd in which the custodian of those records signed a sworn affidavit saying all of the relevant documents had been turned over in order to co...

They say that the notion that the records contained materials and should not have been cause for alarm and that the archives should continue to negotiate in good faith to get the documents back. we know, those negotiations went on for months and the former president had still not returned all of those. the trump team did not rebut, fact by fact, many of the damning items the justice department laid out in a court filing, earlier this week. they did take issue with a june 3rd meeting. the trump t...

The trumps attorneys making the case that including a new attorney brought on to represent him, the former solicitor jen until florida, the question they were putting forward and the case they were making was that president not only is protected under the presidential records act but privilege. there is little case law -- the nixon v. u.s. case in which nixon was ordered unanimously by the supreme court to turn over those tapes and other materials as part of the investigation into watergate was ...

Least, vocal on his social media platform, right, with dozens of postings and messages over this past week, bizarre conspiracy theories, et cetera, but today hes out talking on the radio about the january 6th related stuff. >> right. hes really made himself the martyr in this situation and even his lawyers were bringing up rule 41-g, in criminal procedure, hits at the improper search and seizure of ones property and would suggest that that property be returned here. now ultimately donald trump h...