2004 campaign. kick us off here, dasha. let s talk voter mindset as we head into this debate. you talked to a group of voters from battleground pennsylvania. what did you hear from them? reporter: yeah, we talked to a very specific slice of voters in that critical battleground state. and in a critical county, erie county, pennsylvania, where we re following voters very closely. we talked to republican voters who went out and voted for nikki haley in the pennsylvania primary. now, that happened months after haley dropped out of the race. so these voters went out, voted for a candidate that was no longer in the race. they did it to send a message, ana. and those haley voters, we went to see what they re thinking ahead of november. some of them are going to come back home, to their republican party and vote for former president trump. some of them are considering voting third party, still persuadable, they don t like either candidate, they don t know what they re going to do.
actually is an option, especially for the duration of the trial and we don t know at this point that has not indicated that he s going to sequester as far as we know right now, these jurors go home at the end of the night the next car it s go to kyle. kyle from ontario, canada. hey, kyle, with your question and if not, how were the lawyers able to get into their accounts especially if they are private? and along the same lines, what would prevent a juror from purposely deleting any okay. so incriminating posts. that s a really important question with let s let s talk about that. if we, if we can, that s lisa from i think napa, idaho. was they asked this question. let me go to lie on this because i think it is really interesting to think about the access to the jurors information. of course, nobody wants us to happen. they want anonymity to be able to not have intimidation and beyond what s your reaction so these are that s a. great question. thank you for asking it.