of course, it s political, they can use any reason, just as any jury can, to not remove him. i don t think the fact that it was not actually completed isn t a good one, especially since he s encouraged other countries to do the same thing at this point as well. what you fancy legal types called incohate crime. it was not completed but is still bad because of what it intended to do. elliott, i think the reason that argument won t work as well as mine, she s smarter but it is my show and my head is bigger in the windows, is that rudy giuliani was all over it. his boy was pushing all the buttons for him on his behalf, circumventing a system that was in place to do it the right way. that s why rudy was involved, elliott. if they wanted to go after corruption, even a u.s. citizen in ukraine, we have an agreement
a good fit for that job. so i don t really see a good argument. of course, it s political, they can use any reason, just as any jury can, to not remove him. i don t think the fact that it was not actually completed isn t a good one, especially since he s encouraged other countries to do the same thing at this point as well. what you fancy legal types called incohate crime. it was not completed but is still bad because of what it intended to do. elliott, i think the reason that argument won t work as well as mine, she s smarter but it is my show and my head is bigger in the windows, is that rudy giuliani was all over it. his boy was pushing all the buttons for him on his behalf, circumventing a system that was in place to do it the right way. that s why rudy was involved,