The bench observed that the appellant can at the most be said to be a member of CPI (Maoist) and therefore provisions of UAPA under sections 13 and 38 are attracted and the same provide maximum punishment of seven and ten years, respectively.
Jagtap is facing charges under the anti-terror law, the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, and her plea challenges a Bombay High Court order that denied her bail last year.
Bhima Koregaon case: SC adjourns hearing of bail plea of Jyoti Jagtap aninews.in - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from aninews.in Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Judgments/OrdersUAPA - Watali Precedent Won t Apply If Evidence Is Of Low Probative Value On Surface Level Analysis: Supreme CourtCase title: Vernon v. State of MaharashtraCitation: 2023 LiveLaw.
Judgments/OrdersSupreme Court Sets Aside Order Suspending Conviction Of Lakshadweep MP Mohammed Faizal; Asks Kerala HC To Decide AfreshCase Title: U.T. Administration of Lakshadweep v. Mohammed Faizal.