including many of the former federal and the number one issue raised was you do not know me. you don t know how i operate. specifically, you don t know my risk profile or my resources or capabilities to deal with it. and for us to engage beyond transactional events, we need to know each other better. which then led us into pursuing how could we increased that engagement, that became a second principle and that was finding neutral benefit. as the presidential innovation fellows put it, measured value, not investigations. so we have defined from the perspective a corporate site what is the mutual benefit. ben paper actually speaks well of this. what are the business case, what is the value proposition for engagement with the private sector, and the outlined a number of things useful. and so we re trying to probe what that might look like over time, how we could develop that come how to understand that better. which then now that you ve identified how you can work together, how
and, as we know, it worked. lincoln won the election of 1864. and at 8:00, george washington university president chad heat on the origins of the gay rights movement. the gay liberations front is playing on and building on all of the lessons that the whole other ray of social and cultural movements from this period are developing. the anti-war movement, the civil rights and black power movement, women s liberation movement. they are taking the best aspects of those and building upon them. sunday evening at 6:00 on american artifacts, we take a tour of the woodrow wilson house in washington, d.c., with his executive director robert enholme where the president retired and died 23 years later. he responded to that crisis by sending food aid to armenia. they were very grateful and a group of armenian women touring the united states raising money for armenian charities were here in 1917 just after we declared war. and presented this painting to president wilson. and at 8
vuslat, the floor is yours. good morning, ladies and gentlemen. president obama in his latest speech at the united nations said, until basic questions are answered about how communities co-exist, the embers of extremism will continue to person, countless human beings will suffer and the world is too small for us to build a wall and prevent it from affecting our own societies. yes, he is correct. the world is too small. and the people s destinies are more interrelated to each other than it has ever been before. a threat here at this place in the world is not only affecting these people, this play, but the entire globe. and we ve seen this in global finance. we ve seen this in public health. we ve seen this also in many other cases. but we are rooecently experiencg it in refugee crisis and terrorism. the wall that obama is referring to has appeared in our lives recently when the european countries started talking about build up a wall to keep the threat of refugees away from
and i think the section 215 program is one that the government has made the argument that they need bruce force collection, they need the retention to identify previously unknown links in information. have we given thoughts to whether there are technological options available to limit correction for a program like section 215, if you haven t been more generally, you can be more specific about correction options. with respect to section 215 the data is collected initially by the phone company. the question is whether the information needs to be transferred in bulk to the intelligence community in order for them to do their analysis and it is pretty clear that as a technical matter, the kinds of linking, looking for multi hot links that the intelligence agencies want to do, can be done technically while the information is held to a third party such as the phone companies. this requires a modest amount of technical coordination between the entities holding the data and the ent