hail mary pass because the courts refused to review 90% of such cases. but in a huge victory, in april of 1999, a federal judge agreed to hear beverly s case. steve northup and katie monroe believed beverly had been convicted of murder based on statements that were coerced. they obtained detective riley s investigation notes, which katie described as revealing. he decided up front that it was a homicide, and he decided up front that my mom had done it. and then he viewed everything through that lens. and, she says, once the detective zeroed in on her mother, he resorted to police dirty tricks, and his bullying took its toll. he wore her down. and he caused her to second guess herself and her memory. but prosecutor jack lewis contends beverly wasn t coerced, saying she went along with riley because she had to explain why she flunked that polygraph and would say anything to keep the suicide theory alive.
beverly monroe s daughter came to her rescue. is your mother a murderer? oh, god, no. a recent law school graduate, katie monroe was convinced the case against her mother amounted to little more than speculation and conjecture. i could hardly imagine a weaker case. i can say with complete confidence that the prosecution did not prove that this was a homicide. because they d initially assumed the death was a suicide, police at roger s home hadn t preserved the crime scene. there was no physical evidence, no fingerprints, no fibers, nothing to implicate beverly. besides, says katie, that initial assumption that roger had killed himself was correct. both of the prosecution s firearms experts said that they couldn t rule out the possibility that this was a suicide. the defense theory that roger had killed himself because he was an aging, ailing emotional wreck. a man terrified of suddenly having the very thing he d thought he wanted.
after building. who is keeping count on the number of people that have been displaced? what is not included is the same thing that is missing with the operations of the institution. who is universally accountable to? they are not accountable to the 200 2259 employees. in fact, they were bused in the unions back in the 1980 s. the 200 on-site students, to my knowledge, the knowledge of this institution, it is very hard to gain. they re answering questions that were not email. finally, the inp says the university b. hayes in an ethical matter, but they destroyed a theater, with 250 seats and the only major african-american theater company in the state of california. this is three minutes. i appreciate this. and you can submit any thing. is there additional public comment? i would ask that people who are interested in speaking, to line up. we just don t have any additional speaker cards. i was here to listen and i thought that there were comments i will keep this b
completely discarding the marriage to create an art institution. without the consideration of the artistic interests, we are giving students an opportunity to have student debt, rather than the individuals. a student who has taken out private loans. this is paid back four decades on end. i ask you to consider the ability for these to develop in such a matter. for those to become artists, we are confusing them and we are abandoning the privileges that the artists gained. we have to know what this does to artists and the community at large. the people displaced from their homes. to allow students to come in on loans and just an industry of false art. i would urge you to consider this plan and just taken action to look at the academy of art. is this just a real taste real estate scam? thank you. [applause] hello, a commission. i am katie monroe and i come here on behalf of the san francisco art institute. i have worked in the admissions office for about three years. i have
this plan and just taken action to look at the academy of art. is this just a real taste real estate scam? thank you. [applause] hello, a commission. i am katie monroe and i come here on behalf of the san francisco art institute. i have worked in the admissions office for about three years. i have seen what this is like to sit down with the prospective students to look at their work and look at how much money that they have. and to create a plan that works for that student. and to admit them because the institution sees that they have the potential to do well, to be nurtured by the institution and to graduate and go on to other professional endeavors. there is no portfolio that has been set, or required to be admitted to the institution to be considered in this deeply concerns me. i am it in a considerable amount of debt by i feel that my education i received is one of great merit, and of great meaning and great individual growth. and this is what i have received. i worry