thanything not investigating i anything with respect to biden. you look at what they had with the steele dossie r, which was no credible source compared to whad t they have with this 1023 on joe biden fromoe their most trusted, credible source. and then, sean, i want you to think about this. ntou to thk aboutwo things. first of all, they wouldn t even admit that this documentum until senator grassley and i told christopher wraexy that wed had already read the document from the whistleblower. sohe docum once i got to view the document, it was apparent there were more documentt was an as early as monday when ga the briefing ford 90 minutes to try to say there were no more documents when we were negotiated last nightght op on postponing this this motionmn to hold them in contempt, they finally admitted there are more. fiy ad1020 threes on biden than bribery. and they re going to let me see those non and brw. so we re making progresswe with with the fbi. the fbi clearl are mg progy hasy jo
it is just words, really. let’s that. biden is bothered. the rest of it isjust words, really. it isjust words, really. let s get onto a bit it isjust words, really. let s get onto a bit of it isjust words, really. let s get onto a bit of substance. joe - it isjust words, really. let s get i onto a bit of substance. joe biden stands there and meets with the fairview world leaders there. how important is a meeting with rishi sunak and what do you make of what they chose to focus on? they chose to focus on? well, clearl , they chose to focus on? well, clearly. to they chose to focus on? well, clearly, to time s they chose to focus on? well, clearly, to time s point, - they chose to focus on? well, clearly, to time s point, just l clearly, to time s point, just words. clearly, to time s point, just words, but the words do matter, and it is important to have rishi sunak in the it is important to have rishi sunak in the oval it is important to have rishi sunak in the oval off
and again is borisjohnson has tried to wriggle out of the whole picture and quite frankly i think this reinforces again that after everything that happened and everything that happened and everything in total we need to consider whether. .. everything in total we need to consider whether. that everything in total we need to consider whether. . . consider whether. that is interesting consider whether. that is interesting but consider whether. that is interesting but his - consider whether. that is i interesting but his supporters say this is a witch hunt and stitch up and it was his lawyers that alerted and it was his lawyers that alerted and handed over saying there was no wrongdoing. so in actualfact boris johnson and his team have been proactive about this? but johnson and his team have been proactive about this? proactive about this? but i think the response proactive about this? but i think the response by proactive about this? but i think the response by boris proactiv
and a little bit to the end, they spell that again. potato that was former vic president dan quayle in 1992 telling it had to add in eat t the end of the word potato a lesson for all kids an adults everywhere, there is no easy at the end of the wor potato i myself remember at the tim vowing to never spell potato run again. it was a signal moment and yes, moments like that earned dan quayle a reputation as a bumbling vice president maybe not the sharpest tool in the shed but in late december of 2020 then vice president mike pence was desperate, donald trump wa refusing to concede th election despite having clearl lost to joe biden. trump was putting amends pressure on the vice president to use his ceremonial role i
interviews have taken place? lloathe interviews have taken place? who should be the interviews have taken place? who should be the next interviews have taken place? who should be the next chairman of the bbc, do you think? bbc, do you think? well, we will have to adjudicate bbc, do you think? well, we will have to adjudicate on bbc, do you think? well, we will have to adjudicate on whoever i bbc, do you think? well, we will have to adjudicate on whoever is| have to adjudicate on whoever is chosen through the process. do you have faith in chosen through the process. do you have faith in the chosen through the process. do you have faith in the process chosen through the process. do you have faith in the process now i chosen through the process. do you have faith in the process now for i have faith in the process now for the next one? have faith in the process now for the next one? ~ . ., the next one? well, at the moment, clearl if the next one? well, at the moment, clear