with my office with 12 leadingt- eight leading scientists in the area of a.i. some are very worried that a.i. canactual actually overtaklye you and thinking this is just amazing.ne i don t want to let this kernel off the hook first. of all. i mean, he went on and on with this example. it was this spoken in the past e as it had actually happened, not hypothetically may happen.es and they had to reverse course on the entire story. he basically said that the drone had killed a human operator and then said , just kidding. i misspoke out of context. is this is nonot a gafft e. it s not a slip of the tongue. greg, this is serious stuff. at the same time, when the air we force i mean, just this week,eda the new york post reported that a chinese jet got dangerouslt y close to an air force carrier. air force going workke o ho different things. i don t want him to get off the hook, though. how did you read this? well, here s the deal.he wasefei okay, whatng he was referringpal to is what s cal
committee does. that s what this committee was created to do. wewe have oversight overn th the federal government. but for some reason, the fbi thinks they re immune to oversight. look, the durham reporlike thete that the fbi has lots of issues. we brought that up, senator grassley. and i reminded director wray that the durham report wasthe f. devastating to the credibility of the fbi and his response was that that all happened befoream he became fbi director . fbi so, look, all we want is this for and it s not classified.eda they can redact the name ofe the informant. i m fine with it. i would have i redactet if i hdf i had the document. you know, without that the red redaction. let s protecuctiont the human informant. i agree with that. we shoult.d always want to be very clear . you believe in the credibility of this this whistleblower. you believe that the allegation that joe bidention tha as vice president received money for rhis family or family enterprie in exchange for a speci