now. congressman, thank you very much for joining us. what are we learning? and are we getting to the bottom of this? well, we are getting closer and closer to the bottom of this. there is so many things to consider as we are looking. one of the things that was on so many people s minds is why was the lab theory dismissed by the administration and the scientists at the top my people at nih and dr. fauci? why were they so against talking about the lab as a possibility when at the beginning that was a very clear possibility? we have seen some things coming out that say, what scientists says, it is engineered, three days later they come out and start to write a story called proximal origins that said oh, definitely came from nature, so that is one problem, but we also really today start to discuss why it is very possible it came from the lab and who was behind it, where we funding it? not only that, one of the
answer a straightforward but important question. how did kooern first spread. there s been so much speculation that dates back three years. no firm answers. today the committee trying to get to the answers. they heard from dr. red field as he mentioned. the lawmakers that lead this hearing insist that today is only the start of a much broader investigation. discovering the origins is vital. it matters for the future of the world. we aren t finished. we re just beginning. the facts are the evidence remains inconclusive. therefore we must allow our scientists and intelligence communities to gather evidence without politicization. the white house says the intelligence community investigations remains john going even as the fbi, the energy department, they all say the lab theory is the most likely. at a senate hearing, the
disprove any type of lab theory. the house select subcommittee studying the origins of the virus will hold its first hearings on march 8th we will have popcorn and coverage fred. indeed. thank you. for more political insight into the fully asko and the deception , let s bring in david grasso. and want to bring this soundbite , this goes back to 20- 20. this goes back to dr. fauci. that mutations that it took to get here is totally consistent with a jump of a species from an animal to a human. the paper will be available. eagle back to what kevin was talking about, there was an e-mail chain that statement appears to be somewhat deceptiv in 2020. aren t we lucky we live in a age or you can play back the tape? it wasn t so long ago this woul
study about whether covid started in wuhan by nature or in the lab? if you look at that that s fine that you want to look at whether it came from the labor nature. what we find in the emails is that the quote focus is to disprove the lab theory. so why would you do that? what is the motive behind that? you played the clip there from dr. fauci saying it came from nature. definitively it must be from nature. right after that he gets a thank you from the eco health alliance who does coronavirus research saying thank you for saying that. why was there effort to disprove the lab theory and go with nature? it s three years down the road and still haven t found an intermediary holding covid-19. the plausible explanation seems to be from the lab and more and more people are seeing that. i sat on intelligence committee
steered by doctor for our in doctor collins and doctor fauci. and my main focus is to disprove the lab theory. to say this did not do enough to put down the lab theory. doctor fauci says that comes from nature. they discussed there are some sequences similar to the coronavirus. and then that is the answer to say there is no evidence that that sequence is related to covid-19. and funding the coronavirus research through the nih