Page 41 - Lanham Act News Today

On June 1, 2023, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals found that a Lanham Act false advertising lawsuit was not covered under the “personal and advertising injury” coverage section of a...

John Gary Maynard, III Intellectual Property Attorney Hunton Andrews Kurth Washington, DC & Richmond, VA focusing on brand protection, software audits, and online enforcement, including domain name counseling and litigation.

PHILADELPHIA – A Virginia business who claimed a Philadelphia law firm’s negligent misrepresentation resulted in it losing $30 million has lost its case, through the firm’s successful attempt to dismiss the legal malpractice suit brought against it.

Host Bobby Guy does a wrap up on Album 5, talking about the soundbytes that hit home and summarizing the healthcare business opportunities he's heard from guests, and then talks...

Whether you operate a large e-commerce company on Amazon, a specialized artisan store on Shopify or Etsy, or a local t-shirt company, all brands producing products resembling famous...

The Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision on June 8 in Jack Daniel's Properties v. VIP Products LLC, __ US __ (2023), a victory for Jack Daniel's in a battle over whether a dog toy...

In a case originally based on a false advertising claim under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded...

On June 2, 2023, the Ninth Circuit reversed a dismissal of Plaintiff Enigma Software Group’s (“Enigma”) Lanham Act false advertising and related state law claims against its competitor,...

SC sided with Jack Daniel’s in trademark infringement dispute with dog toy manufacturer VIP Products. Justice Elena Kagan authored opinion, noting whiskey and dog toys as concepts rarely appear together.

On June 8, 2023, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court resolved the petition in Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLC with two narrow holdings: (1) the threshold trademark infringement test espoused...