chuck todd said. remember that this ruling, the health reform act, affordable care act, which republicans like to call obama care, was upheld by one of the most conservative jurists just below the supreme court, judge larry silverman, who believed that it was constitutional. that was what the white house took as a strong argument, a strong indicate they re it would be upheld if it were given a fair hearing.รง now that we know the decision has been handed down what kind of decision this will be, but as pete and chuck and chris have been saying, you could have nine separate reasons for either upholding, in part or. we have seen major supreme court rulings, chris, they are very, very specific and individual jurists, even among certain blocks, can take certain and very different let me interrupt you. going to pete now.
Transcripts For MSNBC Jansing And Co 20120628
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Transcripts For MSNBCW Jansing And Co 20120628
archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
like you said, he was on the short list, but two other appellate judges in the country have upheld the health care reform, judge sutton and judge larry silverman. both of them had no problem dismissing the challenge to the act. the fact that three pillars of legal conservatism have opposed it could weigh heavily on the justices. we won t be there to have the natural play by play. what is it like, and why don t they in the 21st century with so much at stake, allow more public access with what is more of a deliberation than anything else that may happen in the years to come? it s a shame there are no cameras in the court, although it may dilute my role as supreme court reporter. it would be great to see it at work, and the fact that the
the system implodes. this is insurance 101. so if republicans get the short-term political win they want, it s sure to rise to 50 or 60 million and we ll end up on the road to medicare for all, precisely the road the gop says it takes but no doubt is unconstitutional. the case is set aside for oral arguments for six hours over three days, the most a court has spent on a case in 45 days. the average case just gets one hour. the crazy thing is there are no cameras or transcripts allowed, even though 3000 people slated to get health care could lose it. why should we see if nine lekd people throw ought a policy change in a generation? we start with mike sachs, and jeffrey rosen, george washington law professor. welcome, gentlemen. mar mike, let me start with you. there are four separate legal issues the state is taking up. i ll start with the main event. the first biggest case that s coming before is on tuesday, actually. the cases start on monday, but on tuesday there will be