offer to visit the white house. that would happen at the end of the process to finalize it. it s clear the president wants to keep the conversations going. now we have to have conversations at a lower level. mike pompeo is saying they are not at square one. we can have a discussion on whether or not this was a restart of negotiations or a reset. what is clear is they have a long way ahead of them. the two sides need to come together at some crucial issues. stay with us. i want to bring in our panel. christopher hills and victor chau and lauren gambino. i want to start with you, victor. you and hans were working on this topic. now that we had time to think through what happened, what is the next crucial step based on
immigration plans for a few months now. he used it to his advantage many that debate. we will get the numbers soon, of how they did at the latest quarter in fund-raising, which is another indicator. today is the last day. we will see who is doing better after the debate. joshua, lauren, thank you for taking the time on this sunday. we have seen a variety of policy positions come from more than 20 democratic campaigns this cycle. if they had to boil it down to one big idea, what would that be? we have that next. g idea, what be we have that next. snacking can mean that pieces get stuck under mike s denture. but super poligrip gives him a tight seal. to help block out food particles. so he can enjoy the game. super poligrip. can t see what it is yet.re? what is that? that s a blazer? that s a chevy blazer? aww, this is dope. this thing is beautiful. i love the lights. oh man, it s got a mean face on it. it looks like a piece of candy. look at the interior. this is nice.
press them and make it clear that we cannot walk away from this and leave them with nuclear weapons. i think the president is doing this first. he is up in front. i think we all should support him. frankly, i would like to see his national security adviser, mr. bolton, who spent a lifetime opposing talks with north korea is supporting the approach of his boss. if anything, we re not seeing what was typical during both of your times and the idea of multilateral work and discusses and negotiations as we look now at this president working directly with the leader of north korea. lauren, you will be back with us. hans, thank you for your nonstop work for the last 24 hours. ambassador hill, victor, thank you as well. always great to have the big brains to talk about this topic. thank you all. have a good sunday. the verdictic ion the deba
step by step basis with the north koreans. from the north koreans, i would like to see a restatement of their interest in denuclearization. i would like to see a kind of list of steps they re prepared to take, starting, for example, with the list of their programs. they have never listed that. secondly, with some notion of scheduling of how they might dismantle these programs. they offered, for example, to dismantle the one complex which is as far as we know the largest. let s hear a little more about that and let s see if they will put that in the context of an opening step rather than a sort of concluding process which is clearly not enough. there needs to be a lot more discussion. frankly, i think as victor suggests, we need to really get serious at the working level and not just have these photo ops at the presidential level. lauren, who is the team?
electability calculus in their head. that being said, i feel like lauren made a good point about the new generation of leaders, especially african-american, who say they want some type of moral purity from the candidates. they want a candidate who can speak to them in the year 2019 and have a little bit less baggage perhaps than the vice-president. i want to look at some of the numbers. i know the two of you, as journalists, love to watch the numbers as well. it s the data we re going to look at based on our story lines. this coming up. it looks at the favorability and unfavorability numbers of the candidates post debate. if we can pull that up. i will show them to you. i would like to get your reflection. look at the winner of the debate potentially here. is favorability. i want to be clear about this, favorability. before the debate, 56.2. 66.9 after the debate. we also have the favorability