violate the constitution as clearly understood. this federal court says okay you re right, they can t implement the law. this is different because in this case texas decided private individuals would actually be the ones to sue and enforce the law. they outsource this. and so the question for the supreme court is really who can sue to stop this law and who can be sued? it maybe doesn t sound as sexy as is this law constitutional, but it s incredibly important because if we allow texas to do something like this then we ll see potentially blue states, democratic states doing the same thing. and that s why this gun rights group is like, no, no, no, we need to weigh in here. exactly right. and let s look deeper into that because how dangerous a precedent could this be if it stands? it could totally upend our understanding of how we enforce laws, who can be sued when we re
Un référendum sur l immigration… pour quoi faire ?
la-croix.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from la-croix.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
Un référendum sur l immigration… pour quoi faire ?
la-croix.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from la-croix.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.