to expire, and officials have been warning about a potential surge in migrants at the us mexico border. officials have said that when title 42 is no longer in effect, tens of thousands of people could try to cross over. let s remind ourselves what the policy is, and how it might affect us immigration policy. the temporary law, introduced by donald trump, known as title 42, meant illegal migrants could be removed quickly, and it expires overnight tonight. the policy made it easier for the us to send people back to mexico, using the coronavirus pandemic as justification. the winding down of covid measures means the policy no longer has any public health justification, prompting officials to announce it would end on 11 may, the same day as the official us public health emergency. and when it ends, in a few hours from now, the us will return to a policy where migrants are screened, to determine if they are eligible for asylum and quickly deported if they do not qualify. earlier,
to expire, and officials have been warning about a potential surge in migrants at the us mexico border. officials have said that when title 42 is no longer in effect, tens of thousands of people could try to cross over. let s remind ourselves what the policy is, and how it might affect us immigration policy. the temporary law, introduced by donald trump, known as title 42, meant illegal migrants could be removed quickly, and it expires overnight tonight. the policy made it easier for the us to send people back to mexico, using the coronavirus pandemic as justification. the winding down of covid measures means the policy no longer has any public health justification, prompting officials to announce it would end on 11 may, the same day as the official us public health emergency. and when it ends, in a few hours from now, the us will return to a policy where migrants are screened, to determine if they are eligible for asylum and quickly deported if they do not qualify. earlier, us homelan
welcome to bbc news, thank you forjoining us in the studio stopping the arrest of imran khan has led to a nationwide protests, it has been declared illegal by the supreme court as well and the former attorney general called this arrest and extreme misstep, was it a misstep? i extreme misstep, was it a misstep? misstep? i won t call it a misstep, misstep? i won t call it a misstep, i misstep? i won t call it a misstep, i think - misstep? i won t call it a misstep, i think there i misstep? i won t call it a i misstep, i think there were some requirements that should be taken care of like arresting him once he leaves the court. that s about it. if you really look at the case it s amply clear that should have happened and some must happen if we want to maintain the law and pakistan. to maintain the law and pakistan. ., ., ., ., pakistan. oh no that imran khan has said these pakistan. oh no that imran khan has said these are pakistan. oh no that imran khan has said these are not
the largest developers of pakistan, he is very famous for his developments called town. according to the law and the united kingdom, that £190 million of ill gotten money unexplained wealth needed to come back to pakistan in the exchequer. at belonged to the people of pakistan. this is the law in the united kingdom. find law in the united kingdom. and the uk national law in the united kingdom. and the uk national crime industry did say that their case had nothing to do with mr khan. his name is not mentioned in the writing of the case so it comes back to pakistan itself. it’s back to pakistan itself. it s very clear back to pakistan itself. it s very clear because - back to pakistan itself. it s very clear because the money that needed to come back to the people of pakistan, rather than coming to the people of pakistan, imran khan brought a little piece of paper, just like the cypher that he pulled out in front of the people and said here is the proof that the us has conspired