Page 14 - Lead Up News Today

Big departure and thats how its being viewed in the rest of the world. internationally its being viewed as a big departure. when the president himself said in response to a question that this crosses many lines, he said, way beyond even a red line, well, then everybody internationally puts out their ears. we havent actually heard that for a very, very long time. people at the security council even saying that what nikki haley was saying today is reminiscent of talk in the united states in the le...

Mccaskill was speaking out this morning. shes now trying to clarify some discrepancies in that series of tweets she sent out about this issue, the attorney general jeff sessions. it started with this one. well put it up. she tweeted this this morning. ive been on the armed services committee for ten years. no call or meet with russian ambassador ever. ambassadors call members of foreign relations committee. people quickly pointed to this tweet in 2013 where she mentions going to a meet with the ...

Of the show, what were they thinking? what was the benefit to them except buzz? and not all buzz is good with respect to the presidency. >> i think youre right. in the past its not been milo yiannapolis. its always been ann coulter in that mix for exactly that reason. they want us talking about it in the lead-up and in the days after. >> if only we knew how to get matt sleps phone number, perhaps we can call him and get him on the show. >> we have been efforting. >> great seeing you, michael. >>...

>> that was my next point. it was more the politicizing of intelligence, as opposed to the intelligence itself. this is something donald trump doesnt know the difference about. it appears he doesnt understand that what went wrong with the lead-up to the iraq war and the claims of wmd, it was exactly that. the it was the politization of the intelligence. not the intelligence itself. that is what we learned in hindsight. somebody part of the bush administration and supported the war in iraq, that ...

Werent focused enough as a party, right? this is not about obama, this is about democrats across country. we rested our laurels on this demographic shift and we would win the white house. we didnt win the white house, it turns out. and that maybe we had it backwards which was it wasnt what obama didnt do down ballot. its actually the incredible feat that obama achieved at the national level. >> thats an interesting way to spin it. >> youre lcome. >> right? so theres two ways of looking at ts. ba...

I wrote in a piece for the nation a hundred years now hell be a titanic figure in american history. >> thats a big lead-up. that means whatever is coming is terrible. >> 900 state lgs youre seats, 27 state legislative chambers, 62 house seats and 11 senate seats. what that says to me is there was something happening before this election and do you think barack obama owns that? is he responsible for that? >> i think hes responsible for his part in it. i think that we -- look, no one knows. if any...

On the one hand, faith based beliefs. when you put your trust in a person or an institution or a religious leader so when they say that, you have faith in that individual to tell you the truth. and the opposite of that is a rational based way of thinking. you dont except a claim just because somebody makes it. you need to actually see evidence for it. and the second come possibly is exactly what were lacking when it come to claiming the russian government is behind the leaks. >> lets stipulate t...

We have seen what happened with the paris attack. we know what can happen when these guys recruit online to come after those of us who love freedom so much. the president trying to reassure the public sunday night. polling would suggest people are worried about this. 65% of the american public was focused on how to keep america safe. so will the president touch on that today? will he feel like he will need to? judge napolitano: look where he is. hes in the pentagon. he presumably just finished m...

Theyre a jc team, theyre contained, they cant attack the united states, theyre just a bunch of killers were guns and social media. >> first of all, the intelligence story is -- >> what, about them cooking the books? >> that is an enorm os story. you have to find out, a, if its true and, b, if it is true, where did the pressure to cook the books come from? >> how much does that sound like 2002 and the lead-up to the iraq war? ? >> there are a great deal of similarities between 2002 and this intel...

Former british prime minister blair is now apologizing for mistakes made in the lead-up to the iraq war but he will not apologize for removing saddam hussein. this past weekend blair acknowledged that sad did not have weapons of mass destruction as they claimed at the time. >> i can say that i apologize for the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong because even though he had used chemical weapons extensively against his own people, against others, the program in in the form we thought...