daily white house press briefings and he ll do a news conference every two weeks to get a message out. what do you think of that? i don t buy that and the conversation about shake-up is too simplistic. let s go inside washington, d.c. for a emt movement i served in the national security council at the white house. it s not about just who has a job. it s who has access to power. that s right. and who he listens to. new york is about money. washington is about how close you are to the oval office. who is in, who is out. steve bannon, which most americans didn t pay attention to being removed from the national security council, the principles committee and in my world that s huge. i think you might see a different constellation of who has access to the oval office. it s more about layering than firing. and it s not new under the sun. he plays one against the other. four people who have the same job, deputy chief of staff and various titles and that s what he does. he creates thi
package by money that went to the state and to the city to fix roads. as barbara points out in the story, a stimulus is a short-term fix. i mean, what we really need to do is increase the demand. the demand for new products, the demand for new jobs. a stimulus doesn t necessarily do that. it s a brief shot in the arm. i think it s helpful. i think it can tide us over. in the long term look, we ve lost 8 million jobs since 2007. wie we d have to create 200,000 new jobs a month to get back to that in three years. i mean, no stimulus bill, however large, can do that. it s not going to do it. the quote from the article, the cold truth of the matter, though, is that on there s not much washington can do to gwynn up permanent jobs on such short notice. that s right. so, for those that are tying but that doesn t mean right, but in the end, long-term economic growth, it sounds like, time magazine s saying, it s going to come from the private sector, not from
idea that sandra bullock was married to this guy. no. how could she know that? maybe she didn t watch the oscars. who knows. maybe she doesn t have a television. maybe she doesn t have a tv. maybe she can t read. maybe she was busy getting a tattoo. being a tattoo model is a very busy job. i can tell you that. she is. pat buchanan can tell you that. jesse james, the husband, the motorcycle whatever he is, motorcycle gang or something, sandra bullock s husband, allegedly cheating on her. not a smart guy. not a smart guy. no. let s talk about joe biden. i always like to talk about him when i get the chance. not only was he entertaining you good people down in washington at the corners dinner in washington, before that having a good time at the white house for st. patrick s day where he was honoring irish cowen. thought very nice. he paid a tribute to the prime minister s late mother. one detail overlooked by the vice president is that she s still alive. he knows a
basically said we ve broken al qaeda. most intelligence leaders go up to capitol hill going, they are powerful, we could get blown up any second. in fact, i ll probably be shot down when i walk out of this i mean, because you want americans to be ready for the worst. leon panetta gave a very rosy scenario. i hope it s the truth. he basically said, we ve crushed them. they re on the run. they can t touch us. they are very confident about the success they ve had with pakistan and with these drones and this intercepted message. with bin laden s lieutenant complaining, you know, to the great leader, saying, you know, stand up, be a leader, we need you, complaining to bin laden himself. so, they really feel, perhaps, overconfident but a lot more confident. pat, you ve been in washington actively working with the government, near the government, since 1968. have you ever heard an intel chief be this confident about a major threat? no, i haven t. i hope it s true.
committee, so the deeming and passing, i never heard of it. media matters had something out yesterday saying scarborough voted for deem and pass in 1996 for the national lint removal bill or something like that. i had no idea. why is it that if this has happened so often, those of us that have been in washington forever, a guy that served in congress for four terms, lawrence o donnell, who knows about as much as anybody said, this has never been done before. maybe i mean, you tell me it s been done before it s a rule. it is a rule. it s a house rule. you know, you don t read the house rules that carefully. i certainly wouldn t if i were a member, but could it be because it s never been done on a bill of this magnitude when everyone is watching? certainly. is that the case? yes. but the big part is there s a sense of momentum it s going to pass. the narrative has turned to its passage. i think the republican party is looking for a way to cast doubts