Is where we have those other facilities. I know that was a concern that the a. R. C. Had, i reiterated it at the joint hearing with the Arts Commission , and it is noticeably absent from your presentation. So i would like to have you add that back in so that we can fully understand. Right here on the right side, you will see how this is the loading zone, this is the middle of the image. [laughter] it shows how the bikeway bends. I think that is the only place it appears. I would find it useful to reintroduce your plans that you have had in the past because that pretty well shows in the tight bottleneck areas where ultimately the pedestrian zone is what gives because Everything Else is fixed. Correct. It is another way to imagine it. The street zone is between 4 feet and 10 feet wide, the pedestrian path, the main path of travel never is compromised, but it is that streetlight zone where the furnishings go, where the bike racks and the seating, et cetera. It goes between 4 feet wide and
Thank you so much for hearing our appeal. Happy birthday. Im sorry were this is taking up your item. Time. Here is the block we live on. Our house is in the middle here. And mr. Lees house is on the right. This is the first subdivision in San Francisco. We made good effort to solve this problem with mr. Lee. He has been unwilling to compromise or find a solution. He says he needs a window for ventilation and as a fire exit. Both are which are illegal uses of Property Line window. This is the Property Line window. Our goal is to treat the permit like a new window. For several years thats what i was told would happen by the preservation folks at the Planning Department. Heres the permit. You see the permit. Unfortunately you dont see this on the screen. These are joe duffys notes about the permit. When i heard it was happening it was crazy. We filed a complaint with d. B. I. Mr. Lee was able to walk down the dbi to get a permit to change the window. Mr. Duffy made all kinds of note about
You stated that the permit was improperly issued . Correct. Secondly, we heard mr. Curran talk about while this window open into the neighbors Property Line, does this set up automatically the opportunity for notice of violation . It has been discovered that theres a window that is not exactly legal because it goes into the neighbors Property Line without permission . That specific issue is not addressed in the planning code. I should ask mr. Curran and the next part, whether that would narrate a notice of violation as recently discovered is a win toe that windows that opens across the Property Line. Correct. From taur perspective, we dont address that situation. If we did if it was legally done, now its not conforming to the code, that would not be a violation. It would be allowed to stay that way. I cant speak to the Building Code. Thank you very much. We have lots of questions for you. Welcome back. Thank you. Is there any Public Comment on this item. Please approach. Good evening a
Ourselves. We are not scientists. For us to review a bible like this or to review thats nice, ill accept the data. I dont know. Maybe youre suggestion is correct one. As we sit right now with the advice that you are projecting to us, im not dismissing your advice and counsel. I know the law because we experience on a weekly basis. We might as well save the public the filing fee for the appeals if its the appeal includes any identifications as health is an issue. We can just dismiss it because wash our hands and by saying, f. E. C. , were not in control. My personal conscious wont allow me to do that. Again, we can tell the chances are slim or none because San Francisco Health Department, this is not an attack, does not want to take up this issue and does not want to fight federal statute. You can understand the position. Sure. President swig we want to protect people. I hear what youre coming from. I will take issue with your statement that the Health Department doesnt want to take on
Otherwise stated. Super safai i think that supervisor safai i think that item number one is going to be continued. So actually why dont we take item number two, please. Clerk yp two, ordinance of money to require parties to pay a refundable deposit when requesting written findings when the assessment appeals board has established procedures concerning the waiver and renewal of requests for written findings. Unless theres any comments from my colleague here why dont we hear from supervisor peskins and aide lee hel heppner. The proposed legislation before you today is an amendment to chapter 2b of the administrative code with policies and procedures for requesting findings of the assessment appeals board prior to an assessment hearing. As i understand it and this was sort of urged to our office at the request of the assessment appeals board, these amendments codify the policies and the procedures that have been developed by the assessment appeals board with the cooperation of the assesso