so, what happens to her now? the importance of a lifetime appointment next pointment next - we re the ones getting it done. we re managing type 2 diabetes and heart risk. we re on it with jardiance. join the growing number of people who are on it with the once-daily pill, jardiance. jardiance not only lowers a1c, it goes beyond to reduce the risk of cardiovascular death for adults with type 2 diabetes and known heart disease. and jardiance may help you lose some weight. jardiance may cause serious side effects including ketoacidosis that may be fatal, dehydration, (that can lead to sudden worsening of kidney function), and genital yeast or urinary tract infections. a rare, life-threatening bacterial infection in the skin of the perineum could occur. stop taking jardiance and call your doctor right away if you have symptoms of this infection, ketoacidosis or an allergic reaction, and don t take it if you re on dialysis. taking jardiance with a sulfonylurea or insulin may cause low blo
we think trump granted the pardon. it s also wild to that on the pardon list, it reminded me if you are at a convention and you find out that some publication has some party that is going to be fun. it s like four seats to exactly! you are texting, like, oh, i can bring a plus one? can i get on the pardon looks like it s a club? yeah, it s a book party where you re going to have, right? and in that case bud, who is going to be the incoming u.s. senator from north carolina and should face some questions about this, and i imagine, already is, from local press, saying, can we get this person on the list, unless i m on the list of objections, which is about as clear as you can possibly get. hunter walker, this continues to be incredibly good reporting. thanks to. much thanks so much, chris. all right, still to come the donald trump appointed judge who bent over backwards to hinder an investigation and trump was roundly over ruled. so, what happens to her now? the import
of his sort of humanity and the care with which he seemed to hold the institution. you look at i detected he felt great pride in being part of the historic decisions. like affirming obamacare. he now seems like a hostage of the far right wing of the court. yeah. hostage is a good word. you are right on roberts leadership. he vaulted to become chief justice ahead of other possible picks. it was in part because of the respect for the institution, the quiet conservative he was, that was going to keep the court within the guardrails.ly outsid now. he is a hostage to the other members or is it a court that fails to correct its own behavior? the court can fix this themselves. the justices could stop giving the speeches, stop attending these events, stay out of these environments. that s part of the exchange for a lifetime appointment, you are supposed to stand outside of the
so what happened? we all knew when you give people lifetime appointment with tenure and no accountability, it ends up in utopia. but i think it s a little different the last, oh, 10 years, especially the last 3. most of these universities are not requiring s.a.t. or a.c.t.ments as they used to. the grades have been inflated, the teaching loads have been reduced, and a lot of professors see a lot of new students coming in that wouldn t have been admitted, but they re very ideological. and the courses are therapeutic, ideological, they re political. it s much easier to teach those kind of courses than the enlightenment or the renaissance or calculus. and so i think what s happened is the professors are saying, you know what? we ve got a lot of motivated political students, we have fewer and fewer standards. i m not going to give people c or bs or as, i mean pete: yeah. go along to get along. yeah. and i m gonna do it. so what they do is they take out
inexcusable supreme court ethics. senator sheldon whitehouse, along with congressman hank johnson, have released a letter this week that the two lawmakers sent to chief justice john roberts in private two months, ago before this times report came out, saying, quote, the court needs to get its house in order and adopt a binding code of ethics. my panel is back with me to discuss all of this. molly, i want to start with you. what is your reaction to this second supreme court leak? i think it is insane that there is not a code of ethics for the highest court court in the land. this is the most powerful court. they have lifetime appointments. they even if they are not doing anything unethical, which i m not saying they are not, even the appearance of being unethical is you have a court that is very right leaning. it s a 6 to 3 court. it is a lifetime appointment. and you have clearly a lot of