Contributor and how much money that person or entity gave. I agree. Its a good addition to add that language there in the first sentence. Ok. Those are all the amendments that i would suggest. Im glad to answer any questions about those or anything else in the regulations that you might have questions about. Just more broadly, stepping back for a moment, with this new ordinance and the regulations that are implementing prop f, how will the Ethics Commission be in a position to enforce this ordinance. Is there a data base where all land use matters so defined can be searched to know whether or not Entity Company x and properly made a contribution improperly. These ordinances are only as effective as the enforcement ability. Is there a data base that contains all land use matters . Yes and no. Theres not one that solely contains land use matters as defined here. Theres nowhere that you can just call up a data base and it has all land use matters exactly as that terms is defined and inter
Contributors of 5,000 or more to that committee, which i defined as a secondary major con contributor must be following the name, contribution amount of the major relevant contributor. You need to put the dollar amount after the name of the contributor and after that, you put the names of the contributors to that contributors. That is correct. What she points out here is you would not want to put the name of the contributors immediately after that because that would get in between the name of the contributor and how much money that person or entity gave. I agree. Its a good addition to add that language there in the first sentence. Ok. Those are all the amendments that i would suggest. Im glad to answer any questions about those or anything else in the regulations that you might have questions about. Just more broadly, stepping back for a moment, with this new ordinance and the regulations that are implementing prop f, how will the Ethics Commission be in a position to enforce this ord
Please send yours up. They dont have to be related just the book. All right, here we go. My name is melissa king, welcome to Common Wealth club bsting of scott adams n new book, scott dives into the epidemic of mental shortcuts that he believes is making us prone to believing in bad ideas, according to scott, responsible for people stereotyping all of Trump Supporters as racists believing that gun control is equal to full confiscation and most importantly avoiding selfreflection when personal relationships end. We are excited to have him here today to discuss new book loser think and whatever else you guys would like to ask him, he has told me nothing is off limits today. Please welcome scott. [applause] loser think is a word i invented because i noticed when i was on twitter mostly the debating with various trolls and real people too and every once in a while somebody would make a good comment, i dont quite agree with that, thats really well put. , lawyer, economists, scientists and t
Contributor and how much money that person or entity gave. I agree. Its a good addition to add that language there in the first sentence. Ok. Those are all the amendments that i would suggest. Im glad to answer any questions about those or anything else in the regulations that you might have questions about. Just more broadly, stepping back for a moment, with this new ordinance and the regulations that are implementing prop f, how will the Ethics Commission be in a position to enforce this ordinance. Is there a data base where all land use matters so defined can be searched to know whether or not Entity Company x and properly made a contribution improperly. These ordinances are only as effective as the enforcement ability. Is there a data base that contains all land use matters . Yes and no. Theres not one that solely contains land use matters as defined here. Theres nowhere that you can just call up a data base and it has all land use matters exactly as that terms is defined and inter
He says believing that gun control is equal to full compensation, most impartiallyea avoiding self reflection when a personal relationshipp and spred will very excited having with us here tonight. Loserthink. Whatever else you guys would like to ask him, he is, nothing about so they go. Ladies and gentlemen, please welcome scott adams. [applause]. So what is loserthink. Is the word i invented. Because i noticed when i was on twitter mostly, debating with various controls and real people to print every wont in a while someone would make a really good comment. And i think, i dont quite agree with that but that is really wellplanned. In ejecting theut profiles, it wouldbe a lawyer, or economist, scientist, and it was a, it was just bad ship crazy. Im not supposed see that probably but i would look at it and i would think you would send this. Id click on profile and be a poet, musician, journalist, and i was thinking to myself, is that a coincidence or is there something about your experie