Page 447 - Limitations News Today

Thereafter, i saw either a correspondent or regular guest, i think on msnbc or cnn, she said to the host, that the constitution does not serve our purposes any more. it was written by a handful ofve white slave owners. this is what you get from the marxist left, the constitution. what is in thear constitution? n?due process. free speech, freedom ofly religion, right to bear arms. all kinds of protections for the individual, what else? limitations on government. limitations on congress. limitatio...

Decision through an executive order he doesnt have the power to do that. in fact most of this executive order is putting together task forces and exploring protecting this and directing that its really coloring within the lines of existing federal jurisdiction for the most part. not much is going to change the president is impotent to prevent states from implementing laws that are compliant and that may include banning abortions on circumstances that is the value of the community. most americans...

Decision through executive order. he doesnt have the power to dow that. and in fact, most of this executive order is putting together a task forces and exploring protecting this and directing that. but its reallyy coloring within the lines of existing federal jurisdiction for the most part. and so not much is going to change. o prevent the president is impotent to prevent states from implementing laws that are a compliant with dobbs and thatnd may include banning abortion in most circumstances. ...

Order would be on abortion medication, that it preempt -- >> so send the pill over state lines. >> right. we dont know how hard theyre going to push it. >> kelly, lets talk about the politics of this. the president felt a lot of pressure to do something on abortion but also was pretty clear his hand are tied here. if you want it enshrined in federal law, you have to vote for more democrats who will make that decision in congress. ultimately this has got to go back to the people if they want to c...

As many of these activists wanted it to. and a lot of that has to do with legal concerns that the white house had and that they voiced publicly about the limitations that they have. they were concerned that there were some steps that they were asked to be -- to take, especially around things like using native lands for abortion, that they did not think were legal, there were concerns about the hyde amendment which bans the use of federal funds to fund abortion. so the white house pulled back in ...

>> pat cipollone. >> white house counsel pat cipollone. >> mr. trumps former white house counsel pat cipollone. >> there you go. there will, of course, be limitations, due to executive and attorney/client privilege. but its still a very big deal. this is someone who spent a significant amount of time with the ex-president while he was in office before, during, and after january 6th. he is a witness who could potentially help fill in lots of critical blanks. remember, hutchinson testified that ci...

Since his name came up numerous times during last weeks explosive testimony from former white house aide cassidy hutchinson the committee subpoenaed him for formal testimony under oath. >> white house cancel counsel pat cipollone. >> barreling down the hallway towards her office. >> he said this is a murder suicide pact. >> call pat cipollone. >> mr. trumps former white house counsel, pat cipollone. >> there you go. they will of course have limitations. attorney-client privilege but it still is ...

And weeks leading up to january 6th which is why the january 6th committee subpoenaed him last week, after theyre tempts to secure his voluntary cooperation went nowhere, and today, we learned that mr. cipollone, who is a lawyer, he knows the law, will comply with that subpoena. he will sit for a transcribed videotaped interview with the january 6th investigators this friday. now, pat cipollone met with the committee in april for what was an informal interview. "the new york times" reports today...

Limits on what he could discuss. but we dont know is that whether fridays formal interview will be subject to any such limitations. but even under the april agreement, mr. cipollone did talk about one white house oval meeting with trump. dramatic showdown in which trump tried to install jeffrey clark as the attorney general. because clark as you recall was promising to set a few if he was installed urging republican rip legislators to overturn joe bidens win in several states. at that meeting, t...

>> as a prosecutor, when you have someones credibility that might be questioned in the way of whose side they are on, cooperation is key. as we mentioned, he testified informally in april. it was reached on limitations for testimony. that allowed discussions of the meeting with clark. and official that tried to help mr. clump -- trump cling to power. also any interactions with members of congress. also recollections of the events. not conversations that they had with trump except for the january...