Page 537 - Limitations News Today

Things get hammered around for two years and lead to nothing. after billions spent on this investigation and really dogs the trump administration for the first half if not more of the administration. they have seen one fairly attorney, kevin klinesmith that was charged for changing the words about carter page, if he was an asset or not and this guy. people go thats it? you think this is a big deal? >> yeah, i dont think so though. i think durhams hand is being forced here because of the statute ...

Right. even if you get the imf to withdraw funding from the government, that ultimately is going to hurt the people of your country and theyre already suffering a major economic downturn. there is real poverty in nicaragua not seen for many years. do you really want to see funds withdrawn in that way? i would like to see strict limitations in the access of internationalfunds by the nicaraguan dictatorship. and, yes, i dont expect the international community to get rid of ortega. i think this is ...

They ary that clinton campaign used their law firm to submit dubious information to the fbi about russia and trump to gin up investigative activity to hurt his 2016 campaign. there has been no sign that he has found any evidence that have theory. so what that apparently leaves durham with is a lawyer who gave some -- the fbi some information he says he thought they should have. the fib chased that down and decided, eh, its probably nothing. and maybe that lawyer, there is some question as to whe...

As for why this case is being brought now, well, look at the clock. the meeting in question here happened on september 19th, 2016. whats todays date? september 15th, 2021. because of a five-year statute of limitations for such cases, mr. durham has a deadline of this weekend to bring a charge over activity from that date. literally the statute of limitations, i think, expires on sunday. here it is wednesday, and hes rushing to get this done before the statute of limitations expires. this indictm...

When, in fact, he was essentially doing it on behalf of the clinton campaign. i will say, as someone who has covered a lot of false statements cases, this is a stranger sets of facts ive seen in even potential false statements case. there are things i dontnd about the legal theory thats being pursued here. were told that the deadline is coming. theres a statute of limitations here. we should see a decision, to go forward or cut bait. >> any prosecution, quote, would be baseless, unprecedented an...

Long. but it does tend to suggest that they worked very very hard and that this is all they have. which does not sound like much. i do want to reserve judgment until we see all the facts. it could be that so often happens at the first charge is not the last charge, that this is the first charge and its an effort to tame leverage over someone to attempt to obtain their cooperation to see if theres more information that you can charge. but the statue of limitations is going to be butting up any ot...

Linked to then condit donald trump to russia. at the statute of limitations was making a false statement to the fbi in five years meaning he really just has two more days to get this done. durham is moving forward with the charge of making that false statement to the fbi and hes interviewed dozens of people inside and outside the government over the past two years and is investigation of an thats access to grand juries and other investigative materials. and in part he said to mr. sussman has com...

The michael flynn case dismissed that case because they found that his statements were not material. you remember that he lied to at fbi about what he said to the russian ambassador during the transition time. if those arent material, its really difficult to see how this omission or false statement is in any way material here. >> also it strikes me again, looking at this as a non-lawyer, the statute of limitations is the end of the week. its a five-year statute of limitations. it appears to expi...

Rushing to get this done before the statue of limitations expires, this indictment is apparently not been filed yet. we do not have all the facts, yet whether this lawyer told the fbi untrue, about who his client, was whether it matters who his claim was when he gave the information for them to look into. that is something that may end up being hashed out in court. but the big picture here, the substance and suspicion around the alphabet stuff, is this might be evidence of some means of convert ...

Amended the statute of limitations to be amended, and so congress could step in here to create new causes of action to enable the victims to feel safe coming forward and they wont be shamed or ostracized and instead heard and some kind of money damages or reparations and these 100-plus girls who were abused after the fbi found out about it in 2015 deserve some compensation from the u.s. government for not taking their actions seriously and stopping what as you indicate, garrett, horrific, horrif...