Page 566 - Limitations News Today

Of his report under questioning from congress that no currently sitting president could be prosecuted, could be indicted for those crimes, but a former president could be indicted for crimes like that. that was part of the reason why the record had to be created in the mueller report of trumps behavior, including witnesses recollections of his behavior so that that could be preserved in case of future prosecution. well, the statute of limitations on those potential crimes laid out in muellers re...

The record had to be created in the mueller report of trumps behavior, including witnesses recollections of his behavior so that could be preserved, and case a future prosecution. the statue of limitations on those potential crimes laid out in muellers report, that statute of limitations have not run out. in the event todays testimony from don mcgahn results in a referral to the justice department for a potential prosecution of the former president, the statute of limitations would not be a prob...

H howitzers. as someone who served in the military is that a fair analogy? >> its not. im a second amendment advocate and i do possess a weapon, but i do see the need for ar-15 type of weapons modeled after the kind the military uses, they need to have significant modifications and limitations, and i think thats the fault in what the judges ruling showed today. folks like me, a lot of police departments and people like dr. rainy seem to say the same thing because they see the damage these kinds ...

Or not. he insists that he didnt knowingly did anything wrong. some of this conduct at issue, frankly, is from the time period of 2000 to 2014, which might be past the statute of limitations in a straw donor case, which is five year. theres other conduct that runs more recent. and obviously, the fbi wouldnt investigate if they didnt think there was any way they could probably bring charges. but the short answer to your question is, louis dejoy has signaled that he intends to do that, and hes als...

Finding out, dejoy himself was subpoenaed, we reported and that led to us reporting. >> do we know if mr. dejoy is cooperating with the investigation? >> he says that he is. we know he was served with a subpoena and hell have now some time to turn over documents or not. he insists he didnt knowingly doo anything wrong. some of the conduct is from 2000 to 2014, which might be past the statute of limitations in a straw donor case. obviously the fbi wouldnt investigate if they thought there wasnt a...

Is from the time period of 2000 to 2014 which might be passed the statute of limitations, which is five years. theres other conduct that runs more recent. the fbi would investigate if they didnt think there was any way it could bring charges. to answer your question, louis dejoy signaled he intends to do that. hes also signaled hes done nothing wrong. he believes hes done nothing wrong. >> interesting point about the statute of limitations and how long he did this, if he did carry out a scheme l...

The white house, the senate. >> right. >> why not use the levers of power the same way republicans used theirs? >> there are places where there are obvious limitations. on the abortion restrictions in the state. you could pass theoretically a law through congress that codifies roe v. wade but again it would be difficult to overcome the filibuster and comes down to that. absent that, it goes to the supreme court. if the supreme court likely confirms it with conservative majority theres not much b...

Maybe 1 out of 7 workers who are offered a job back declined because of the jobless benefits. there were a lot of other reasons. on the margin, a small but noticeable influence from those unemployment benefits but those are going to be expiring. the bigger issue is just after covid, there are millions of people who had jobs or multiple low -- low wage part-time jobs working two jobs or three jobs, and theyre not ready to go back to that quite yet. theres a reckoning in the american labor market ...

Prior incident and to create a false document. even donald trumps most ardent defenders, those that say well he was exercising a constitutional imperative of the presidency. cannot defend that. here we are two years later. the travesty is there is zero consequences to this. >> okay. so does it matter? it matters in terms of correct being the record. thats important. but legally, can his testimony provide the basis to reopen any lines of inquiry regarding the president or the former president and...

It helped me straighten out the corners and actually give a little bit more gas in some cases where i was quite willing to sometimes lift off. would i replace a live instructor with this? probably not. hes aware of all sorts of things going on in the car, including whats going on for me, whereas at the moment, this isnt. so its better than nothing, but it doesnt replace ben. people need to understand the limitations of what it can do and understand what it cant do, as we experience through the d...