Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20170207:23:44:00
>> well, your honor, we think we prevail under either test but we think this case is closer to larson because in larson, what you had was a facially neutral law. it didnt not mention religious domination by name but it did focus on religious groups and the result of it was to distinguish between them in a way that favored some and not others. and thats exactly what we have here. we have an order that on its face doesnt mention any denomination, but that is -- we have alleged and theres strong ev...
Source: news source