on that question, is there a general danger that the white house, through its rhetoric, is animating too many people to jump to conclusions against immigrants and in the process, diminishing the entire immigrant community, what they re law abiding or not? not at all. the president has been incredibly outspoken against crime in any form, fashion. certainly from his joint address to his speech last week on holocaust remembrance day. look, this is a law and order president. he s focused on restoring law and order. we ve seen a spike in crime across the board, not just in any particular sector. that s why he talked so much about needing to restore law and order in this country. that s why he s focused on securing or border, stopping
done. he s made it no secret, he s committed to reforming the health care system. you re going to see that process take place. we re not going to get ahead of the legislative process. we expect there to be some changes. we expect thears to remain the . it sounds like there will be wholesale changes. i know this is hypothetical, but if the senate makes substantial changes to what passed the house, will it get out of the congress? again, we re focused on the big principles, lowering costs, creating a competitive environment, giving states the ability to make decisions within the health care system. we don t expect those things to change. again, i feel like there will be some changes. that s part of the process, the legislative process. we fully anticipate that to play out, but we expect the big piece
we he s looking at being the president that reformed health care to benefit americans. we re calling it reform and calling it a system that works. just to follow up on timeline. senator cornyn said we re not under any deadline. i heard you said you expect the senate to take this up on short order. are you on the same page? i said i expect them to take it up, meaning the conversation. this is a process. we haven t put a timeline or a deadline. we want to get it right, not fast. that s the focus. it could take months, do you acknowledge that? is the president willing to wait that long? again, we want to get it right, not an artificial deadline. the administration has not laid
the video is obviously stopped there for obvious reasons. chris hayes is with us now. you have covered this extensively, in fact, all the way back in early february, you filed a request for this video. yeah, so we started covering this back in january, february, we filed a request. that request was denied for the city of chicago, citing the fact that it would unduly taint the due process for the officer involved. we filed an appeal. that appeal was rejected. meanwhile, another independent journalist in chicago started this litigation process which led to it being released. i think one thing that s important to set the context here is that this was not mike brown, that people are very familiar with in ferguson, was a very high-profile case from the moment it happened. he was shot and people were tweeting about it within minutes. there was a crowd that assembled that day. it was a big, on-the-front-burner case from the beginning. laquan mcdonald was not. there were a few hundred word
and they might. they might, but you need an expert to step in and say, i looked at the study, relied on the study, did my own due diligence, and my report that s based on x, y, z methodologies, confirmed that study. a study in and of itself, as tragic as it is, will not comment. but, lisa, they ll start trying to attach all of the other accidents and incidents of the current and saying at least in a small part this had to have played a role. that s what invariably happens, right? invariably. there will be more claims coming out of the woodwork. you do have to look at the litigation process. we did have the toyota action, and they actually agreed to consolidate this and created a class. you could see that here in gm. because the class could be so large. they said $1 billion aside we re told for this. is that enough? and did they, in fact? is the $1 billion to pay damages? because that s where that s where i m unclear. because gm most companies have an insurance policy to