As youve heard from several of the Board Members today, the resources are there so theyre not scrambling to get resources to make should happen, whithis if you look at the list, i think most schools would want those to happen, but they have to pick and choose from their own budget, and what im saying is its incumbent on me to look at our own budget, but also to go out and raise the resources so that these things are happening at these sites and schools arent having to come out of their own budgets, so whats different is these components will be in both sets of schools, whatever column that those schools are in, but they will be centrally allocated resources to make sure its happening in the way it needs to happen for students. Great, and i think how i im just trying to also identify what areas i can be helpful, and i think it sounds like were going to be needing to do some fund raising outside of what we already do, as well as think about other resources that are available, and so that
That would restrict participation in or reporting of information but i have never understood so closed does not speak to the merits of the number of complaints received. Im wondering if theres a reason and i think there is, but if you could tell me again, i would appreciate it. You are correct. Because the complaint is closed doesnt mean it was substantiated. We evaluate the complaint, the investigation determines if theres a factual basis for the allegations and then if the allegations are true, if the alleged conduct would violate city criteria, policy and procedure or city code does that answer the first part . Substantiated or unsubstantiated are both inside the closed category. And in the quarterly and annual reports it breaks down it breaks out by department. Theres a table in quarterly reports or chart showing which percentage of complaints closed led to Department Taking corrective or preventive action. Or even it shows whether or not the department moves on the recommendation
I think thats on us, so as community members, we need to show up. If our expectation is that we collectively need to do the Work Together to get our kids to where we need to be, so i want to appreciate your willingness to also not start from scratch and build on what we are already doing, because i do believe that there is strength in many of the areas, and we also have some areas where were weak. And you called a lot of that out, and i want to continue to work from an asset based model and acknowledging when we were actually in the areas that we are doing well, because we it always feels like we are doing nothing, and i want to understand what we will be doing differently, and what youll need from us to be successful. Because the areas many of the priorities that youve identified are priorities that weve all identified in the past. Theyre you know, your professional capacity, instructional guidance, you know, transforming mindsets, i think thats actually a new one that is is really gr
Francisco bay community, we respect all the people who have been here for generations, we respect you, we respect the community. We honored the work that you have done. Its hard work to allow people to recognize whats right and wrong and do the hard work. Its the hardest work that we have to do today, whether youre holding a public office, being a minute center or bei minister or community activist, its hard job, but it serves our community and our children, and we must try to do better. This has been an important home to gobs of community meetings, employment workshops, to incubators for employment opportunities, and its also been a place where sadly, weve also had to send people away, who died in violence or met an early death. All of those aspects of life that are challenging the city, its happening in a microcosm there at 3rd baptist in a collusive and collaborative way. So im just sharing thisome things, but ill also share with you some strong feelings with people that ive got to
In the count if we didnt spend the money to keep them affordable. Mrs. Hartley, i have a one question for the Mayors Office of housing. Do we take into and i want to state i redshirt members of the pub will lick speaking to how we dont just want this annual record to happen. We want the Planning Commission and housing to take into account the accumulative balance. Otherwise it doesnt hold it accountable to the numbers. When we look at the geographic data and where we had the largest loss of units and production, do we have an acquisition plan that looks like at the geography in district 4 where we have a high level of wasp and low production. Can we look to prioritize sites in those discretions to ensure Affordable Housing production. We would love to build more houses. In d4 we have a teachers site a combination of low and middle Income Housing. We are looking forward to form sf. I dont have the large sites to bring tax corrode its to bear officially. Have be in thes that dont have si