take it seriously is he wanted hillary to win. the logic doesn t follow. he s also wrongly accused the president of the united states of wiretapping trump tower during the campaign. ordering wiring to help her campaign and hurt his. every time we talk about this, i return to bob mueller in the russia investigation. at the end of the day these tweets and president trump s attempts to throw stuff as chum in the water, they ll work with people. but bob mueller now has three people cooperating him who are former trump officials. he s charged paul manafort with crimes, 13 russian officials with a widescale attempt to influence the election on behalf of trump and to hurt hillary clinton. it s hard to argue. if mike flynn or george
that s possible, if he does that, he s going to have more problems than he has right now. yeah, i agree with you on that one. jason chaffetz questions the need for a special counsel! look, i have not seen any evidence of actual collusion. where is the actual crime they think they need a special prosecutor to prosecute? i haven t seen that. something that we re missing here? something he s missing? no, that logic doesn t follow. there s plenty of circumstantial evidence of involvement in the campaign. in fact, there are clear statements that have been b made that the campaign itself was involved with the russians. our own intelligence agencies have said so. but the reason you do an investigation, the reason you subpoena witnesses and subpoena document ss to get the evidence. so, i m a little work out on members of congress and others