Page 646 - Logic News Today

Or a building that collapsed because there is a plane crashed floor it or there is an enormous amount of storm or something. how that much of a building could collapse so quickly with no warning, it doesnt make any sense to me. but there are engineers maybe and other people that have that expertise. >> and we will eventually find out. but it defies logic and all rational thought how you see that surveillance video how it went down in the middle of the night. commissioner, thank you so much for c...

Me so ill speak for myself and then ill explain what ive heard from other folks. my initial reaction was more empathy and sensing the pain that the people who were directly involved in the building and their family and friends were experiencing. so i didnt really go to that fear right away. however, i was asked by a reporter and my logic was that if it was that bad, then they would have evacuated the area if they thought that there was other buildings in jeopardy. so thats my rationale right now...

Here without having to quarantine if the rate _ here without having to quarantine if the rate in — here without having to quarantine if the rate in that country was much higher— the rate in that country was much higher than— the rate in that country was much higherthan ours? the rate in that country was much higher than ours? particularly if we are towards— higher than ours? particularly if we are towards the end of the process which _ are towards the end of the process which we _ are to...

Sweeping across the country. >> if senators 60 years ago held that the federal government should never intervene to protect voting rights, this body would have never passed the voting rights act. the republican leader uses the language and the logic of the southern senators in the 60s who defended states rights, and it is an indefensible position. >> there is no effort in any state in america to suppress votes based upon suppression of minority participation. what this is really about is an effo...

Favor of even allowing debate on the legislation. put another way, all 50 republican senators voted no. while states are back home working hard to suppress the vote or certain votes, should we say, theres not a republican in the senate who wants to even allow a debate on this topic. an angry majority leader spoke moments after the vote was announced. >> senate republicans have signed their names in the ledger of history alongside donald trump, the big lie, and voter suppression. today, every sin...

Into so we are not ending this fight. and one of the ways we do that is getting out of this capitol dome and heading out to the state. >> some, im just the guy asking questions here but why take a victory lap of excitement over a field trip to georgia already represented in the senate by two democrats? its an uncontested yes, yes vote to any voter measures in the senate. why not, and im just putting this out here, go to a state with one or more republican senators? >> its a good question. i mean...

Uk are _ at the moment for the fact that the uk are simply not taking advantage of what _ uk are simply not taking advantage of what has been a world—class vaccine — of what has been a world—class vaccine roll—out. we believe the government should be opening the skies _ government should be opening the skies yesterday, and we cant understand any rationale or logic as to why— understand any rationale or logic as to why we _ understand any rationale or logic as to why we are outliers in ...

We conduct elections in this country. it is a solution in search of a problem. regardless of what may be happening in some state, theres no rationale for federal intervention. >> my colleagues, my colleagues, a senator 60 years ago held that the federal government should never intervene to protect voting rights, this body would never have passed the voting rights act. the republican leader uses the language and the logic of the southern senators in the 60s who defended states rights. and it is a...

His body never wouldve protected her past the voting rights act. the republican leader uses the language and the logic of that southern senators in the sixties who defended states rights and it isnt indefensible position for any senator, any senator, let alone the minority leader to hold. >> and thats really what were seeing here, although again it comes down to the question before the country of the democrats whether they can hold the caucus together to take this step that would be a big stop. ...

Have never passed the voting rights act. the republican leader uses the language and the logic of the southern senators in the 60s who defended states rights and it is an indefensible position for any senator, let alone the minority leader, to hold. >> thats what were seeing here. it comes down to the question before the country and the democrats of whether they can hold the caucus together to take this step that would be a big step. and what do you think about the clyburn idea, which i think is...